Agriculture Reference
In-Depth Information
Chapter 8
Animal welfare and ethics in organic agriculture
Vonne Lund*, National Veterinary Institute, Norway
*Dr Vonne Lund, National Veterinary Institute, PO Box 8156 Dep, Oslo 0033, Norway. Tel: +47 0 2321 6367,
Fax: +47 0 2321 6001, Email: vonne.lund@vetinst.no
Introduction
Animal welfare is a question of the animal's quality of life (Sandøe 1999) and is an area of
increasing concern in Western society. In the European Union (EU), animals were officially
recognised as sentient beings in 1997, in the Treaty of Amsterdam (EUR-Lex 2003), with
England, Austria and Norway being examples of countries implementing new and stricter
animal welfare legislation. In the United States of America (USA), the large fast-food chains
have joined efforts with the supermarkets to establish some animal welfare regulations for
their suppliers (Brown 2004).
In organic farming, there is a tradition of animal welfare concerns (Niggli and Lockeretz
1996, Boehncke 1997, Roderick and Hovi 1999). The organic movement frequently identifies
animal welfare as an important goal, but welfare is also an area where strong criticism regard-
ing organic animal production has been expressed. While some have argued that organic
animal husbandry represents the best possible welfare in contemporary farming, representa-
tives from conventional agriculture have often been critical of the welfare of organic animals.
Consumers have appreciated the organic way of raising animals (although this is not always
ref lected in the sales records of organic products, Magnusson et al . 2001), and animal welfare
is regularly used as a positive marketing argument for organic animal products (Harper and
Henson 2001).
The question has to be asked, what are the reasons for these diverging opinions regarding
animal welfare in organic production systems? This issue will be examined in this chapter,
evaluating the underlying values in organic farming and whether there is an animal welfare
problem in organic farming.
Animal welfare and ethics
Although there is general agreement that animals should have a good quality of life, there is no
agreement as to what this means in practice. A good example to illustrate this is the two dog
owners who both claim they provide their pets with the best possible quality of life (Fraser et
al . 1997). The first makes sure to give the dog nutritious food, extra vitamins and regular coat
trimming and always keeps the dog leashed to avoid it getting run over by a car, eating some-
thing harmful or running away. The other dog owner is less concerned about a balanced diet
or a well-trimmed coat. During long hikes, the dog runs loose and can play in the dirt and may
occasionally find and eat rotten meat scraps. This owner wants the dog unleashed since this
187
Search WWH ::




Custom Search