Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
assign to each node a number to indicate its level in the tree. Let T =
i I T i .We
prove the following two claims
(a) If s is a state-based process and o
A
( T , s ), then there are some
{
q i } i I with
i I q i =
i I q i ·
= i I q i o i , and o i A
˄
1 such that s
ʔ i , o
( T i , ʔ i ).
{ q i } i I with i I q i =
(b) If ʔ D
( sCSP ) and o A
( T , ʔ ), then there are some
1
i I q i ·
= i I q i o i , and o i A
˄
( T i , ʔ i )
by simultaneous induction on the order mentioned above, applied to s and ʔ .
such that ʔ
ʔ i , o
(a) We have two subcases depending on whether s can make an initial ˄ move or
not.
• f s cannot make a ˄ move, that is s
˄
−ₒ
, then the only possible moves from
T
| Act s are ˄ moves originating in T ; T has no non- ˄ moves, and any non- ˄
moves that might be possible for s on its own are inhibited by the alphabet Act
of the composition. Suppose o
A
( T , s ). Then there are som e
{
q i } i I with
i I q i =
= i I q i o i and o i A
1 such that o
( T i , s )
= A
( T i , s ). Obviously
i I q i ·
˄
s .
• f s can make one or more ˄ moves, then we have s ˄
we also have [[ s ]]
−ₒ ʔ j for j J ,
where without loss of generality J can be assumed to be a nonempty finite set
disjoint from I , the index set for T . The possible first moves for T
| Act s are ˄
moves either of T or of s , because T cannot make initial non- ˄ moves and that
prevents a proper synchronisation from occurring on the first step. Suppose
that o
p k } k I J with k I J p k =
A
( T , s ). Then there are some
{
1 and
p k o k
o
=
(5.14)
k I J
o i A
( T i , s )
for all i
I
(5.15)
o j A
( T , ʔ j )
for all j
J .
(5.16)
For each j
J , we know by the induction hypothesis that
˄
ʔ j
ʔ ji
p ji ·
(5.17)
i I
o j =
p ji o ji
(5.18)
i I
o ji A
( T i , ʔ ji )
(5.19)
p ji } i I with i I p ji =
for some
{
1. Let
q i =
p i +
p j p ji
j J
1
q i ( p i ·
ʔ ji )
ʔ i =
s
+
p j p ji ·
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search