Ceramide in Stress Response (Sphingolipids) Part 1

Abstract

Evidence has consistently indicated that activation of sphingomyelinases and/or ceramide synthases and the resulting accumulation of ceramide mediate cellular responses to stressors such as lipopolysaccharide, interleukin 1P, tumor necrosis factor a, serum deprivation, irradiation and various antitumor treatments. Recent studies had identified the genes encoding most of the enzymes responsible for the generation of ceramide and ongoing research is aimed at characterizing their individual functions in cellular response to stress. This topic discusses the seminal and more recent discoveries in regards to the pathways responsible for the accumulation of ceramide during stress and the mechanisms by which ceramide affects cell functions. The former group includes the roles of neutral sphingomyelinase 2, serine palmitoyltransferase, ceramide synthases, as well as the secretory and endosomal/lysosomal forms of acid sphingomyelinase. The latter summarizes the mechanisms by which ceramide activate its direct targets, PKC^, PP2A and cathepsin D. The ability of ceramide to affect membrane organization is discussed in the light of its relevance to cell signaling. Emerging evidence to support the previously assumed notion that ceramide acts in a strictly structure-specific manner are also included. These findings are described in the context of several physiological and pathophysiological conditions, namely septic shock, obesity-induced insulin resistance, aging and apoptosis of tumor cells in response to radiation and chemotherapy.


Introduction

Cells and organisms have developed various strategies to deal with adverse changes in their environment. Cellular insult by infectious agents, toxins, nutrient deprivation, or genotoxic stress produces a coordinated systemic response (generally referred to as inflammation), which is aimed at neutralization ofthe insult and initiation oftissue repair. The first line of defense at systemic level is stimulation of the innate immune response, which consists of regulated production of inflammatory mediators, including cytokines like IL-1P, TNFa and IL-6. The typical cellular response to environmental stressors includes the induction of cellular apoptosis (in response to either genotoxic stress or cytokines like TNFa), growth arrest (during nutrient deprivation), increased eicosanoid production, cell migration and adhesion (in the presence of infectious agent). While acute inflammation is protective for the organisms, excessive and long-standing inflammation is harmful and underlies diseases like septic shock, atherosclerosis, asthma, rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease.

Diverse signaling pathways mediate cellular response to stress. The sphingolipid second messengers ceramide, ceramide-1-phosphate, sphingosine and sphingosine-1-phosphate play important role as mediators in many of these pathways. This topic is focused on the role of ceramide in cellular stress response and the mechanisms of its generation and action.

Structure of ceramide.

Figure 1. Structure of ceramide.

Chemical Structure and Biophysical Properties of Ceramide

Ceramides (Fig. 1) form the hydrophobic backbone of all complex sphingolipids1 and consist of a long chain sphingoid base and amid linked fatty acid which is either saturated or unsaturated and vary in length from two to 28 carbon atoms. In mammalian cells, the most commonly found ceramides have D-erythro-sphingosine and a saturated fatty acyl chain of 16 carbon atoms and are among the most hydrophobic lipids in the membrane. Free ceramide has a very low critical micellar concentration (cmc < 10~10M) and cannot exist in aqueous solutions.2 Nevertheless, ceramides are still considered as amphiphiles because the hydroxyl group at the first carbon and the amide bond are hydrophilic moieties. Dihydroceramide differs from ceramide inasmuch as the latter contains a trans 4, 5 double bond, which is essential for some of the bioactive roles of ceramide.

The structural features in the ceramide molecule that are required for its biological properties are not well understood, however the two hydroxyl groups, amid group protons and the trans-double bond seems to be involved.3 A network of intramolecular hydrogen bonds involving the OH and NH groups establishes a unique conformation arrangement of ceramide molecule.

Changes in Ceramide Mass during Stress

The basal ceramide concentrations in the cells are low and may change during cellular differentiation or progression through the cell cycle. Various inducers of cellular stress however lead to an accumulation of ceramide that promotes apoptotic, inflammatory and growth inhibitory signals and also mediates the onset of a specific response. The data in Table 1 illustrate what is the magnitude of changes in ceramide levels under various conditions of stress. These reported differences however, are likely to be an underestimation since they are measured in total cell preparations and not in the specific membrane fractions where ceramide was generated. Furthermore, with the exception of mass spectrometry—based assays, the most commonly used methods of ceramide quantification do not separate the individual ceramide species.4 This might be important as the impact ceramide has on cell functions seemingly depends on the type of fatty acid attached to the sphingoid base. Recent data indeed support the notion that the different biological effects caused by ceramide may be mediated by distinct molecular species of the lipid, underscoring the necessity to evaluate changes in ceramide content in a structure-specific manner.

A comparison of the magnitudes of ceramide accumulation observed under various treatments reveals that the changes are more robust in response to chemotherapeutics or irradiation. As the outcome of these treatments has been the induction of cell death via apoptosis, some investigators suggest that ceramide plays the role of a gauge that senses the level of cell injury and depending on downstream factors determines specific biological outcome.5

Table 1. Changes in ceramide content in response to stress and during some pathophysiological conditions

Control

Treatment

Assay

Tissue/Cell Type

Ref.

Hypoxia/

4.5 pmol/nmol LP

8.5 pmol/nmol LP

Mass Spec

NT-2

6

Re-

100%

200% of control

DAGK

Cardiac myocytes

7

oxygenation

22 pmol/nmol LP#

55 pmol/nmol LP

DAGK

NRK-52E

8

250 pmol/mg Pr

900 pmol/mg Pr

DAGK

PC-12

9

100%

300% of control

DAGK

HUVEC

10

100%

50% of control

DAGK

A7r5

11

Ischemia/

110% of sham

175% of sham

Mass Spec

Brain

12

Reperfusion

100%

200% of control

DAGK

Rat cardiomyocytes

13

50 pmol/nmol

90 pmol/nmol LP

DAGK

Renal cortex

14

190 pmol/mg Pr

290 pmol/mg Pr

DAGK

Liver

15

tmp5-23

100%

390% of control

DAGK

Rat astrocytes

16

100%

170% of control

DAGK

CG-4

17

18 pmol/nmol LP

45 pmol/nmol LP

DAGK

Rat myocytes

18

75 cpm/106cells

160 cpm/106 cells

Labeling

Rat mesangial cells

19

1 nmol/mg Pr

1.5 nmol/mg Pr

HPLC

Rat hepatocytes

20

1.1 nmol/mg Pr

1.48 nmol/mg Pr

HPLC

Rat hepatocytes

21

250 pmol/106cells

500 pmol/106 cells

DAGK

HUVEC

22

450 pmol/106cells

800 pmol/106 cells

DAGK

Dendritic cells

23

100%

170% of control

Labeling

Thyroid cells

24

tmp5-24

100%

150% of control

HPLC

Cortical neurons

25

100%

330% of control

DAGK

Rat astrocytes

16

200 pmol/mg Pr

850 pmol/mg Pr

DAGK

U-87 MG cells

26

22 pmol/106 cells

37 pmol/106cell

DAGK

Mesangial cells

27

100%

300% of control

HPLC

Hepatocytes

28

0.8 nmol/mg Pr

1.4 nmol/mg Pr

DAGK

Lung microsomes

29

5.0 nmol/mg Pr

10.9 nmol/mg Pr

HPLC

Alveolar lavage

30

0.5 nmol/nmol LP

1.1 nmol/nmol LP

Mass Spec

Endothelial cells

31

100%

460% of control

DAGK

MIN6 cells

32

100%

700% of control

DAGK

MCF-7 cells

33

100%

175% of control

DAGK

MCF-7 cells

34

100%

250% of control

DAGK

L929

35

5 pmol/nmol LP

13 pmol/nmol LP

DAGK

U937 cells

36

5 pmol/nmol LP

12 pmol/nmol LP

DAGK

SK2

36

Serum starvation

100%

200% of control

DAGK

Mouse keratinocytes

37

LPS

2.8 pmol/nmol LP

4.3 pmol/nmol LP

HPLC

Brain

38

4 nmol/ml

8 nmol/ml

HPLC

Plasma

38

3.2 nmol/ml

4.8 nmol/ml

HPLC

Mouse serum,

39

100%

200-500% of contr.

HPLC

Human plasma

39

3.5 nM/mg Pr

16 nM/mg Pr

HPLC

THP-1 cells

40

258 pmol/mg Pr

1634 pmol/mg Pr

HPLC

Mouse Mo

41

8 nM/mg Pr

22 nM/mg Pr

HPLC

Human alveolar Mo

42

1.1 nmol/mg Pr

2.1 nmol/mg Pr

DAGK

Intestinal mucosa

43

Table 1.

Control

Treatment

Assay

Tissue/Cell Type

Ref.

ER stress

5 pmol/mg Pr

9 pmol/mg Pr

Mass Spec

INS-1 cells

44

Ionizing

100%

700% of control

DAGK

OLG

45

radiation

100%

320% of control

Labeling

CHK cells

46

0.95 nmol/106 cells

1.25 nmol/106 cells

DAGK

BAEC

47

6-12 nmol/ml

9-18 nmol/ml

HPLC

Human serum

48

100%

250% of control

Labeling

Keratinocytes

49

10 pmol/106 cells

50 pmol/106 cells

Mass Spec

Jurkat cells

50

100%

130% of control

DAGK

HEK293

51

100%

140% of control

DAGK

Jurkat T-cells

51

10 pmol/nmol LP

17 pmol/nmol LP

Mass Spec

MCF-7

52

100%

320% of control

DAGK

HeLa

53

100%

140% of control

Labeling

U937 cells

54

100%

900% of control

DAGK

Human platelets

54

Diabetes/

0.5 pmol/^g Pr

1.0 pmol/^g Pr

DAGK

Rat heart tissue

55

obesity

12 pmol/mg tissue

23 pmol/mg tissue

Mass Spec

Muscle

56

25 pmol/mg tissue

40 pmol/mg tissue

DAGK

Muscle

57

0.2 nmol/mg tissue

0.3 nmol/mg tissue

DAGK

Liver

57

15 pmol/mg

23 pmol/mg

Mass Spec

Muscle

58

100%

No change

Mass Spec

Liver

58

3.5 pmol/^l

9 pmol/^l

Mass Spec

Serum

58

0.5 nmol/mg Pr

1.5 nmol/mg Pr

HPLC

Liver

59

2.4 nmol/ml

3.1 nmol/ml

Mass Spec

Human plasma

60

120 pmol/150^

190 pmol/150^

Mass Spec

Mouse Serum

61

380 pmol/mg Pr

580 pmol/mg Pr

Mass Spec

Epididymal fat

61

300 pmol/mg Pr

550 pmol/mg Pr

Mass Spec

Subcutaneous fat

61

650 pmol/ml

1400 pmol/ml

Mass Spec

Mouse plasma

62

310 pmol/mg Pr

210 pmol/mg Pr

Mass Spec

Epididymal fat

62

5 nmol/g

8 nmol/g

Mass Spec

Subcutaneous fat

63

0.6 nmol/mg Pr

1.2 nmol/mg Pr

DAGK

Pancreatic islets

64

250 pmol/mg Pr

180 pmol/mg Pr

Mass Spec

Retina

65

Aging

100%

170% of control

Mass Spec

Cerebral cortex

66

100%

220% of control

DAGK

Heart

67

175 pmol/^g DNA

250 pmol/^g DNA

Mass Spec

Adipose tissue

68

0.45% of total LP

0.8% of total LP

HPLC

Liver

69

1.3 nmol/mg Pr

1.7 nmol/mg Pr

HPLC

Rat hepatocytes

70

0.5 pmol/mg Pr

1.1 pmol/mg Pr

DAGK

Endothelium

71

3.5 pmol/nmol LP

6.0 pmol/nmol LP

DAGK

WI-38 HDF

72

Alzheimer’s

27 nM/ml

52 nM/ml

DAGK

CSF

73

disease

100%

175% of control

Mass Spec

Brain

74

2.5 nmol/mg Pr

9 nmol/mg Pr

Mass Spec

Temporal cortex

75

2.0 nmol/mg Pr

8 nmol/mg Pr

Mass Spec

Cerebellum

75

Heat stress

1.5 pmol/nmol LP

3.8 pmol/nmol LP

DAGK

Molt-4

76

Table 1.

Control

Treatment

Assay

Tissue/Cell Type

Ref.

Oxidative

100%

800% of control

DAGK

Human primary

77

stress

100%

200% of control

DAGK

OLG

78

100%

170% of control

DAGK

Cerebral cortex

79

100%

200% of control

DAGK

PC12

80

100%

350% of control

Mass Spec

Airway epithelium

81

100%

140% of control

Labeling

APRE-19

82

100%

180% of control

DAGK

SMC

83

HAEC

Car-

210.5 pmol/mg Pr

305.9 pmol/mg Pr

DAGK

Mouse heart

84

diovascular

100%

140% of control

Mass Spec

Mouse heart

85

disease

135 nmol/ml

220 nmol/ml

Mass Spec

Plasma

86

Anti-cancer

100%

1000% of control

Labeling

LnCaP

87

therapies

100%

200% of control

Labeling

PC-3

87

7 pmol/nmol LP

70 pmol/nmol LP

DAGK

MDA-MB 231

88

100%

220% of control

Labeling

MDA-MB 468

89

100%

350% of control

Labeling

MCF-7

89

1% of total LP

10% of total LP

Labeling

MCF-7

90

100%

900% of control

Labeling

MCF-7

91

100%

180% of control

Labeling

BT-20

92

100%

300% of control

Labeling

MDA-MB 231

92

100%

650% of control

Labeling

MDA-MB 468

92

100%

300% of control

Labeling

Hs-578T

92

100%

380% of control

Labeling

T47D

92

100%

620% of control

Labeling

MCF-7

92

100%

700% of control

Labeling

HL-60/VCR

93

100%

220% of control

Labeling

U-937

93

100%

220% of control

Labeling

CHLA-90

94

0.6 ng/106 cells

1.8 ng/106 cells

DAGK

JHU-022

95

In some cases numerical values were taken from graphically represented data and were rounded to the nearest whole number. Abbreviations: General: CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; DAGK, diacylglycerol Kinase; LP, lipid phosphate; M0, primary macrophages; OLG, oligodendrocytes; Pr, Protein. Cells lines: A7r5, rat embryonic thoracic aorta smooth muscle; APRE-19, human retinal pigment epithelium; BAEC, bovine aortic endothelium; BT-20—human breast carcinoma; CG4, oligodendrocyte progenitor; CHK, Chinese hamster kidney; CHLA-90, human neuroblastoma; HAEC, human airway epithelial; HDF, human diploid fibroblasts; HEK 293, human embryonic kidney; HeLa, cervical carcinoma; HL60/VCR, drug resistant human leukemia; Hs-578T, breast carcinoma; HUVEC, human umbilical vein endothelium; INS-1, rat insulinoma; JHU-022, squamous cell carcinoma; Jurkat, T-lymphocytes; L929, mouse fibroblasts; MDA-MB 231, human Caucasian breast adenocarcinoma; MDA-MB 468, human Black breast adenocarcinoma; MCF-7, human breast adenocarcinoma; MIN6, murine beta cells; Molt-4; human acute lymphoblastic leukemia; LnCaP, human prostate carcinoma; NRK-52E, rat kidney epithelium; NT-2, human neuronal precursor; PC3, human prostate carcinoma, PC12, rat adrenal medulla carcinoma; SK2, hybridoma; SP-1, mammary intraductal adenocarcinoma; T47D, human ductal breast epithelial tumor; TNP-1, human acute monocytic leukemia; U87, human astrocytoma; U937, human leukemic monocyte lymphoma.

Next post:

Previous post: