Delusions in Habitat Evaluation: Measuring Use, Selection, and Importance - Research Techniques in Animal Ecology - page 161

and sheep: Does habitat ranking reflect resource availability? Canadian Journal of Zool-
ogy 77: 776-783 .
Mysterud, A. and E. Østbye. 1995. Bed-site selection by European roe deer ( Capreolus capre-
olus ) in southern Norway during winter. Canadian Journal of Zoology 73: 924-932.
Nadeau, S., R. Décaríe, D. Lambert, and M. St-Georges. 1995. Nonlinear modeling of
muskrat use of habitat. Journal of Wildlife Management 59: 110-117.
Nams, V. O. 1989. Effects of radiotelemetry error on sample size and bias when testing for
habitat selection. Canadian Journal of Zoology 67: 1631-1636.
Neu, C. W., C. R. Byers, and J. M. Peek. 1974. A technique for analysis of utilization-avail-
ability data. Journal of Wildlife Management 38: 541-545.
Nixon, C. M., L. P. Hansen, and P. A. Brewer. 1988. Characteristics of winter habitats used
by deer in Illinois. Journal of Wildlife Management 52: 552-555.
North, M. P. and J. H. Reynolds. 1996. Microhabitat analysis using radiotelemetry
locations and polytomous logistic regression. Journal of Wildlife Management 60: 639-
653.
Ockenfels, R. A. and D. E. Brooks. 1994. Summer diurnal bed sites of Coues white-tailed
deer. Journal of Wildlife Management 58: 70-75.
O'Neil, L. J. and A. B. Carey. 1986. Introduction: When habitats fail as predictors. In J.
Verner, M. L. Morrison, and C. J. Ralph, eds., Modeling habitat relationships of terres-
trial vertebrates, 207-208. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
O'Neil, L. J., T. H. Roberts, J. S. Wakeley, and J. W. Teaford. 1988. A procedure to modify
habitat suitability index models. Wildlife Society Bulletin 16: 33-36.
Oreskes, N., K. Shrader-Frechette, and K. Belitz. 1994. Verification, validation, and con-
firmation of numerical models in the earth sciences. Science 263: 641-646.
Orians, G. H. and J. F. Wittenberger. 1991. Spatial and temporal scales in habitat selection.
American Naturalist (suppl.) 137: S29-S49.
Ostfeld, R. S. and L. L. Klosterman. 1986. Demographic substructure in a California vole
population inhabiting a patchy environment. Journal of Mammalogy 67: 693-704.
Ostfeld, R. S., W. Z. Lidicker, Jr., and E. J. Heske. 1985. The relationship between habitat
heterogeneity, space use, and demography in a population of California voles. Oikos 45:
433-442.
Otis, D. L. 1997. Analysis of habitat selection studies with multiple patches within cover
types. Journal of Wildlife Management 61: 1016-1022.
Ovadia, O. and Z. Abramsky. 1995. Density-dependent habitat selection: Evaluation of the
isodar method. Oikos 73: 86-94.
Palomares, F. and M. Delibes. 1992. Data analysis design and potential bias in radio-track-
ing studies of animal habitat use. Acta Oecologia 13: 221-226.
Paragi, T. F., W. N. Johnson, D. D. Katnik, and A. J. Magoun. 1996. Marten selection of
postfire seres in the Alaskan taiga. Canadian Journal of Zoology 74: 2226-2237.
Parrish, J. D. 1995. Effects of needle architecture on warbler habitat selection in a coastal
spruce forest. Ecology 76: 1813-1820.
Partridge, L. 1978. Habitat selection. In J. R. Krebs and N. B. Davies, eds., Behavioural
ecology. An evolutionary approach, 351-376. Sunderland, Mass.: Sinauer.