Landscape Function Transformations with Relation to Land-Use Changes - Landscape Modelling: Geographical Space, Transformation and Future Scenarios - page 97

3. Symbol “+” represents an increase or stagnation of a given category in a reviewed period;
symbol “-” represents decrease of a given category in the reviewed period. Category “+ +
+”and “- - -” given under BTUs are theoretically impossible, because we compare territorially
comparable BTUs.
References
Antrop, M. (2003). Continuity and change in landscape. In Ü. Mander & M. Antrop (Eds.),
Multifunctional landscapes. Vol. III - Continuity and change (pp. 1-14). Southampton: WIT
Press.
Antrop, M. (2005). Why landscapes of the past are important for the future. Landscape Urban
Planning, 70 (1), 21-34.
Balej, M. & Andel, J. (2008). Land use changes and environmental stress accounting (case study
from northwestern part of the Czech-German borderland). Journal of Geography and Regional
Planning, 1 (5), 97-109.
Bicík, I. (1997). Land use in the Czech Republic 1845-1948-1990. Methodology, interpretation,
contexts. AUC-Geographica, 32 (Supplementum), 255-263.
Bicík, I., Chromý, P., Jancák, V., Janu, & H. (Eds.). (2002) Land use/land cover changes in the
period of globalization. Proceedings of the IGU LUCC International Conference, Prague 2001 .
Charles University, Prague.
Bicík, I., Götz, A., Jancák, V., Jelecek, L., Mejsnarová, L., & Štepánek, V. (1996). Land-use/land
cover changes in the Czech Republic 1845-1995. Geografie-Sborník CGS, 101 (2), 92-109.
Bicík, I., & Jancák, V. (2002). Development of agriculture and the Czech rural landscape. In
K. Kobayashi (Ed.), Changing regional structure and way of life in Central Europe: The case
of Poland, the Czech Republic, the Slovak Republic and Hungary (pp. 153-182). Gifu (Japan):
Gifu University.
Douglas, I., Huggett, R., & Robinson, M. (1999). Companion encyclopedia of geography. The
environment and humankind . New York: Routledge.
Feranec, J., & Ot'ahel, J. (1992). Land cover forms in Slovakia identified by application of colour
infrared space photographs at the scale 1: 500 000. Geografický casopis, 44 (2), 120-126.
Feranec, J., & Ot'ahel, J. (2000) EEA Phare topic link on land cover (PTL/LC) , Task 6 assess-
ment of land cover and land use changes in the accession countries. Task 6. 1. Evaluation of
methodology, Project Report.
Haberl, H., et al. (2002a). Land use change and socio-economic metabolism in Austria - Part I:
Driving forces of land use change: 1950-1995. Land Use Policy, 20 (1), 1-20.
Haberl, H., et al. (2002b). Land use change and socio-economic metabolism in Austria - Part II:
Land use scenarios for 2020. Land Use Policy, 20 (1), 21-40.
Haberl, H., Batterbury, S., & Moran, E. (2001). Using and shaping the land: A long perspective.
Land Use Policy, 18 (1), 1-8.
Haines-Young, R., & Potschin, M. (2003). Valuing and assessing of multifunctional landscapes: An
approach based on the natural capital concept. In J. Brandt & H. Vejre (Eds.), Multifunctional
landscapes Vol. I - Theory, values and history (pp. 181-192). Southampton: WIT Press.
Hampl, M. (1998). Reality, society and geographical organisation. Finding an integral order .
Prague (in Czech): Charles University.
Himiyama, Y. (2002). Land use/cover change studies in the period of globalization. In I.
Bicík, P. Chromý, V. Jancák, & H. Janu (Eds.), In Land use/land cover changes in the
period of globalization. Proceedings of the IGU-LUCC international conference Prague 2001
(pp. 5-14). Prague: Charles University.
Himiyama, Y., Mather, A., Bicík, I., & Milanova, E. V. (Eds.). (2005). Land Use/Cover Changes
in Selected Regions of the World , IGU Study Group on LandUse/Cover Change, Hokkaido
University of Education, Sapporo - Kita-ku.
Jensen, J. R. (2005). Introductory digital image processing . Upper Saddle River NJ: Prentice Hall.