Geoscience Reference
In-Depth Information
13
C. Low assimilation rates at the start of
the growth season (with high
c
i
and discrimination) give relatively depleted
but more strongly defined cycles in
δ
13
C
values, as
A
increases, to the height of the growing season, discrimination drops
and
δ
13
C rises, to a seasonal maximum. The pattern is then reversed to the end
ciation between enrichment (as a result of moisture stress) with El Niño/Southern
Oscillation (ENSO) events, suggesting that chronology and signal may be derived
from
δ
13
C.
Whist tropical isotope dendroclimatology is still very much in development, and
is only one of a range of tree-ring methods that are being used to exploit the tropical
a dry season prevents annual ring formation, isotope-derived hydrological proxies
might be used to improve the paleoclimate picture of tropical phenomena such as
signal strength has been lacking in most tropical isotope dendroclimatology stud-
ies. However, more rigorous analyses of signal strength, replication requirements,
and quantitative climate calibrations are beginning to appear in the tropical isotope
δ
13
C to Rising CO
2
Concentrations
6.5.4 Long-Term Response of
δ
13
C series often show a decline, particularly over recent
the stable carbon isotope fractionation model;
Atmospheric corrected
δ
13
C reflects the control of
c
i
relative
to changes in
c
a
, over longer timescales. Thus, rising
c
a
has the potential to affect
tree-ring
δ
13
C, and an increasing body of evidence supports this conclusion. If the
effects of changing
c
a
are becoming an additional source of noise in tree-ring
δ
13
C,
δ
this will become a problem for proxy climate calibration.
The simplest way to correct for rising
c
a
is to simply add a correction factor based
on average tree response. However, it is not logical to assume that all trees, at all
sites, will respond in the same way to rising
c
a
,
and there is evidence that response
factors from the literature is ill-advised, as it seems to result in very different time
13
C dataset of
Pinus sylvestris
from northern Finland and derive significantly different corrected series as a result.
A reconstruction based on their different correction factors would produce either
cooling or warming, depending upon which factor was selected; this is clearly a sub-
jective and inappropriate method. It may be more appropriate to correct
c
i
according
to how it changes through time, on a tree-by-tree basis, as
c
a
rises.
Whilst changes in
δ
13
C derived from shifts in
c
a
must be removed prior to cali-
bration, they do reveal important information about tree response to rising CO
2
that
δ