Geoscience Reference
In-Depth Information
(A)
Kvitebjørn
Field
Gullfaks-Kvitebjørn
megablock
(B)
Kvitebjørn
Field
Fig. 3. Fault population and fault linkage trough time during rift development. (A) Pre-rift with Permo-Triassic faults
indicated. (B) Initial rift-stage. The isolated small faults of the initial rift are interpreted to be responsible for the local
depocentres recorded within the base Ness sandstone.
• Early (initial) rift stage:
Initial rift stage is characterised by scattered
normal fault population and development of
scattered local depressions;
Fault propagation with initial fault linkage
and early fault death of some of these faults;
Initial footwall flexing;
Initial fault-block tilting;
• Main rift stage:
Transition to rift-climax is correlated with a
sharp increase in the rate of basin-wide sub-
sidence early in the rift event (e.g. Steckler
et al ., 1988). Gupta et al . (1998) suggested that
the transition from rift-initiation to rift-climax
occurs as fault activity became localised onto
linked arrays (Fig.  3). With a decline in the
number of active faults, rates of fault dis-
placement increase; hence, the rate of tectonic
subsidence increases;
Increasing degree of fault linkage and fault
death;
Escalating rotation of fault blocks and poten-
tial slumping at footwall fault crests;
Episodic fault movement leading to varia-
tions in tilt rate and accommodation space;
Footwall flexing;
• Late rift (or transition to post-rift) stage:
Reduced tilt-rates;
Submerged fault-block crests;
Initial rotation toward the rift axis of the
basin.
Generic pre-rift to syn-rift infill models
To identify the different stages within the transi-
tion from pre-rift to syn-rift in a sedimentary
basin, a set of sedimentary signatures can be
recognised within each stage, as outlined by
Yielding et al . (1992); Prosser (1993); Nøttvedt
et al . (1995); Ravnås & Steel (1998) Gawthorpe &
Leeder (2000); Sharp et al . (2000) and Nøttvedt
et al . (2000):
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search