Geoscience Reference
In-Depth Information
(A)
(B)
Horizontal scale
~ 10 km
Legend
Mouth bars
Smørbukk field perimeter
Interpreted sea floor contours
Land/tidal creeks
Interpreted current directions
Relative water depth
shallow
deep
Fig. 24. Schematic block diagrams showing the interpreted palaeogeographic reconstructions for the Tilje Formation in the
Smørbukk field (dotted outline), relative to the Smørbukk and Trestakk normal faults, during the lower-middle Tilje (T1.2
to T3.1) and B) the middle-upper Tilje (T3.2 to T4) times.
(Martinius et  al ., 2001), which coincidentally,
occurred during a second-order eustatic sea-level
drop in the mid-upper Pliensbachian (Hallam, 1988;
Surlyk, 1990; Hallam, 1999). This palaeogeographic
change could be caused by two possible processes:
1) river avulsion or 2) the repositioning of the river
system by tectonic activity. However, the constant
location of the sediment-entry point over a very long
period of the early Tilje depositional time (during
sequence 2), as indicated by the constant fining
trends (Figs 20 to 21) and the absence of compensa-
tion-style stratigraphic architectures, suggests that
the main fluvial system was probably confined by
structural/topographic controls towards the N-NW.
Therefore, the abrupt switch during the formation of
SB3 implies that a major tectonic movement
deflected the river and locked it into a new axially
oriented (N-NE to S-SE) course (cf. Bosence, 1998).
Search WWH ::




Custom Search