Geoscience Reference
In-Depth Information
and is often taken to be valid a priori for any ionospheric F-region calculation.
However, care must be taken in applying this result since it is not a fundamental
principle and must be checked in each case. It is certainly not true in the E region,
where compressibility plays an important role in the formation of images of
F-region phenomena (see Chapter 10). Setting
( ∇·
V
) =
0, the equations we shall
linearize are
n
/∂
t
+
V
·∇
n
=
0
(4.8a)
∇·
=
J
0
(4.8b)
To study the electrostatic instability of these equations in the presence of a
vertical zero-order density gradient, we can write the electric potential and the
plasma density as
e i t kx )
φ = δφ
(4.9a)
ne i t kx )
n
=
n 0 (
z
) + δ
(4.9b)
where the initial perturbation propagates in the x direction. Note that we have
already assumed charge neutrality so that n e =
n i =
n . Using (4.5) with E replaced
by
δ
E , (4.8b) becomes
(
ne 2
i
E
× B
2
∇·
ne
/ i )
g
+
ν in /
M
δ
=
0
(4.10)
∇· (
×
) =
where again we have used the fact that
n
B
0 to set the divergence
δ
of the pressure-driven current equal to zero. Here
E is the perturbation electric
φ
σ P in the
field associated with the potential
, and we have substituted (2.40b) for
F region. Since
, the vector inside the square bracket in the preceding
equation only has an x component and taking the x derivative yields
δ
E
=−∇ φ
e 2
i
ne 2
i
x 2
eg
/ i (∂
2
2
2
n
/∂
x
)
ν in /
M
(∂
n
/∂
x
)(∂φ/∂
x
)
ν in /
M
φ/∂
=
0
The second term is of second order, and thus the linear form of this equation is
ne 2
i
x 2
eg
/ i (∂
2
2
/∂
)
ν in /
φ/∂
=
n
x
M
0
(4.11a)
Making the substitutions
B 2 , Q
P
=
M
ν in /
=
Mg
/
B
(4.11a) becomes
Pn
x 2
2
(∂
/∂
)
φ/∂
=
Q
n
x
0
(4.11b)
Search WWH ::




Custom Search