Geoscience Reference
In-Depth Information
Page, M., Hough, S. E., and Felzer, K. (2012). Can current New Madrid seismicity be
explained as a decaying aftershock sequence? Abstract S54D-07, American Geophys-
ical Union Fall Meeting, San Francisco, CA, 3-7 December.
Petersen, M. D., Frankel, A. D., Harmsen, S.C.,
et al
. (2008).
Documentation for the 2008
Update of the United States National Seismic Hazard Maps
. U.S. Geological Survey
Open-File Report 2008-1128.
Pond, E. C., and Martin, J. R. (1997). Estimated magnitudes and accelerations associ-
ated with prehistoric earthquakes in the Wabash Valley region in the central U.S.,
Seismological Research Letters
, 68, 611-623.
Pratt, T. L. (2012). Kinematics of the New Madrid seismic zone, central United States,
based on stepover models.
Geology
, 40, 371-374, doi:10.1130/G32624.1.
Ramirez-Guzman, L., Graves, R. W., Olsen, K. B.,
et al
. (2011a). Central United
States earthquake ground motion simulation working group: the 1811-1812 New
Madrid earthquake sequence (abstract).
Seismological Research Letters
, 82,
275.
Ramirez-Guzman, L, Graves, R. W., Olsen, K. B.,
et al.
(2011b). Magnitude uncertainty
and ground motion simulations of the 1811-1812 New Madrid earthquake sequence
(abstract). American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting, abstract S22A-07.
Russ, D. P. (1982). Style and significance of surface deformation in the vicinity of New
Madrid, Missouri. In
Investigations of the New Madrid Earthquake Region
, ed. F.
A. McKeown and L. C. Pakiser, U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1236,
pp. 95-114.
Saucier, R. T. (1991). Geoarcheological evidence of strong prehistoric earthquakes in the
New Madrid (Missouri) seismic zone.
Geology
, 19, 296-298, doi: 10.1130/0091-
7613(1991).
Schwartz, D. P., Hecker, S., Haproff, P., Beukelman, G., and Erickson, B. (2012). The
Bear River fault zone, Wyoming and Utah: complex ruptures on a young normal fault
(abstract). T31E-08, American Geophysical Union Fall Meeting.
Schweig, E. S., and Ellis, M. A. (1994). Reconciling short recurrence intervals with minor
deformation in the New Madrid seismic zone.
Science
, 264, 1308-1311.
Seeber, L., and Armbruster, J. G. (1987). The 1886-1889 aftershocks of the Charleston,
South Carolina, earthquake: a widespread burst of seismicity.
Journal of Geophysical
Research
, 92, 2663-2696.
Stein, S., and Liu, M. (2009). Long aftershock sequences within continents and implications
for earthquake hazard assessment.
Nature
, 462, doi: 10.1038/nature08502.
Stein, S., and Newman, A. (2004). Characteristic and uncharacteristic earthquakes as pos-
sible artifacts: application to the New Madrid and Wabash Valley seismic zones.
Seismological Research Letters
, 75, 173-198.
Street, R. (1982). A contribution to the documentation of the 1811-1812 Mississippi Valley
earthquake sequence.
Earthquake Notes
, 53, 39-52.
Street, R. (1984).
The Historical Seismicity of the central United States: 1811-1928, Final
Report
. Contract 14-08-0001-21251, Appendix A, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Geologi-
cal Survey.
Stuart, W. D., Hildenbrand, T. G., and Simpson, R. W. (1997). Stressing of the NewMadrid
seismic zone by a lower crust detachment fault.
Journal of Geophysical Research
,
102, 27, 623-27, 633.
Sykes, L. R. (1978). Intra-plate seismicity, reactivation of preexisting zones of weakness,
alkaline magmatism, and other tectonics post-dating continental separation.
Reviews
of Geophysics and Space Physics
, 16, 621-688.
