Geoscience Reference
In-Depth Information
An examination of Figures 5.19a and 5.20a reveals a difference in the C c
(Biarez's approach) and C * c (Burland's approach) slopes, particularly between
σ ' v = 100 and σ ' v = 1,000, when the liquid limit is high ( w L =100% to 160%). On the
other hand, for the lower w L , C c and C
*
c are similar, and fit well the experimental
data given by Burland for different values of w L (see Figure 5.20a).
5.9.2. Comparison of models and mixed model
5.9.2.1. Plotting Biarez's model in Burland's space (I v - log σ ' v )
According to correlation [5.7] we have:
ee
I ee
=
P
=
0.46 3 log '
σ
[5.30]
L
v
L
P
Using [5.27] and [5.30] to express Biarez's model as a function of I v , we obtain
the NCRS equation [5.31] in Burland's space:
*
100
ee
ee
P
I
=
1.38
0.46
log '
σ
[5.31]
L
P
L
P
V
C
*
C
*
C
*
According to Biarez, hence [5.2]
P e = and
*
1000
L e =, equation [5.31]
*
6,5
becomes:
ee
*
*
=
6,5
1000
1.38 0.46 log '
σ
1
.
[5.32]
V
C
*
Considering a linear variation between
Δ
e
and log ' v
Δ
σ
, we obtain:
e e
log100 log1,000 log6.5 log1,000
*
*
*
*
100
1000
=
6.5
1000
[5.33]
Thus, Biarez's model given by relation [5.32] becomes:
=−
2 log '
σ
.
[5.34]
V
Equation [5.34] is a straight line in the ( I v - log σ ' v ) plane, passing through two
specific points ( I v = 0, σ ' v = 100 kPa) and ( I v = -1, σ ' v = 1,000 kPa), represented by
the NCRS line in Figure 5.21a. A representation of both the NCRS line and the ICL
in Burland's plane shows that the two curves converge at a vertical stress range
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search