Geoscience Reference
In-Depth Information
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
Fig. 1 Changes in a radiative forcings (DF), b atmospheric radiative heating (DF atm ) due to the top of
atmosphere radiative forcings using scaling factors from Andrews et al. ( 2010 ), c simulated temperature
response using a simple energy balance model compared with HadCRUT4 observations (95 % uncertainty
range) and d precipitation response (DP) using the simple energy balance model decomposed into fast and
slow components (''-BC'' denotes simulations without the effects of Black Carbon aerosol). In d, observed
slow response is also estimated using the HadCRUT4 DT; this is combined with the model fast responses to
provide an estimated total scaling (dotted lines)
10 9 JK -1 m -2 is the deep ocean heat capacity. Thus, DT m is determined by the radiative
forcing, the restoring flux relating to feedbacks, and diffusion of energy into the deep
ocean.
Observed DF is prescribed over the period 1850-2010, based upon the Model for the
Assessment of Greenhouse gas-Induced Climate Change (MAGICC) without carbon cycle
for anthropogenic forcings, 1 and natural forcings are based upon the Goddard Institute for
Space Studies 2 (e.g., Hansen et al. 2007 ) with simple extrapolation of some fields from
1990 onward (Fig. 1 a). The model is initialized at 1850 as DT m ¼ DT D ¼ 0. Since the
1
http://www.cgd.ucar.edu/cas/wigley/magicc/ .
2
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/modelforce/ .
Search WWH ::




Custom Search