Geoscience Reference
In-Depth Information
τ
c
=
ρ
w
g
ω
r
0
π
k
F
(ω, θ)γ (ω, θ)
d
θ
d
ω
(9.21)
−
π
where
is the fractional wave dissipation rate.
In
(9.20)
-
(9.21)
, the upper-limit of integration frequency
γ(ω,θ)
ω
r
is such that at the spectrum
tail
ω>ω
r
the momentum flux goes straight to the current, bypassing the wave-growth
stage. This flux is given by
(9.19)
, and therefore the total flux transferred to the currents is
τ
c
+
T
r
which provides the upper boundary condition.
Total energy exchange in
Figure 9.8
is
g
ω
r
0
π
E
=
ρ
w
ω
F
(ω
m
, θ)β(ω, θ)
d
θ
d
ω.
(9.22)
−
π
Thus, the energy flux from waves to currents and from wind to currents is
E
c
=
τ
c
·
U
c
(9.23)
and
E
v
=
T
r
·
U
c
,
(9.24)
respectively. In these expressions,
k
and
U
c
are vectors of wavenumber and surface current
(see also
Section 2.10
).
Wave breaking and the corresponding energy dissipation produce turbulent energy flux
E
T
to the upper ocean:
g
ω
r
0
π
E
T
=
ρ
w
ω
F
(ω
m
, θ)γ (ω, θ)
d
θ
d
ω
−
E
c
.
(9.25)
−
π
The last term
E
cT
in the upper panel of
Figure 9.8
is due to the wave-induced turbulence
(see
Sections 7.5
and
9.2.2
).
The bottom panel of
Figure 9.8
provides a general scheme of the system of atmosphere-
ocean interactions, subdivided into eight layers with different dynamics. Zero level in
the figure corresponds to the wavy surface, and the wave boundary layer in the atmo-
sphere includes regions
IV
and
V
. The outer WBL extends to the height
h
λ
p
.Itis
here that the dominant-wave-induced pressure oscillations and therefore the wave-induced
momentum flux are felt. The 'dominant wave' scale in this scenario is determined by
ω<ω
r
.
The meaning of the
w
∼
0
.
1
ω>ω
r
play a role in
the internal WBL sublayer
V
. These short waves form the local roughness parameter and
the tangential stress
(9.19)
. The height of this layer
ω
r
scale now becomes clearer as frequencies
ζ
t
is linked to the oscillating surface
rather than to the mean water level.
Layer
III
is the part of WBL where stratification effects become important as described
by the Monin-Obukhov theory (see
(3.19)
and
Section 3.1
). In the case of neutral stratifi-
cation, the profile here is logarithmic, and the roughness parameter is defined by the waves
and the friction drag. Since
h
w
is usually much smaller than the Monin-Obukhov scale
L
,
stratification effects can be neglected in layers
I
and
II
. At the upper-boundary height
h
s
of the Monin-Obukhov layer
III
, Coriolis force has to be introduced.
Search WWH ::
Custom Search