Geoscience Reference
In-Depth Information
τ c = ρ w g ω r
0
π
k F
(ω, θ)γ (ω, θ)
d
θ
d
ω
(9.21)
π
where
is the fractional wave dissipation rate.
In (9.20) - (9.21) , the upper-limit of integration frequency
γ(ω,θ)
ω r is such that at the spectrum
tail
ω>ω r the momentum flux goes straight to the current, bypassing the wave-growth
stage. This flux is given by (9.19) , and therefore the total flux transferred to the currents is
τ c +
T r which provides the upper boundary condition.
Total energy exchange in Figure 9.8 is
g ω r
0
π
E
= ρ w
ω
F
m , θ)β(ω, θ)
d
θ
d
ω.
(9.22)
π
Thus, the energy flux from waves to currents and from wind to currents is
E c = τ c ·
U c
(9.23)
and
E
v =
T r ·
U c ,
(9.24)
respectively. In these expressions, k and U c are vectors of wavenumber and surface current
(see also Section 2.10 ).
Wave breaking and the corresponding energy dissipation produce turbulent energy flux
E T to the upper ocean:
g ω r
0
π
E T
= ρ w
ω
F
m , θ)γ (ω, θ)
d
θ
d
ω
E c .
(9.25)
π
The last term E cT in the upper panel of Figure 9.8 is due to the wave-induced turbulence
(see Sections 7.5 and 9.2.2 ).
The bottom panel of Figure 9.8 provides a general scheme of the system of atmosphere-
ocean interactions, subdivided into eight layers with different dynamics. Zero level in
the figure corresponds to the wavy surface, and the wave boundary layer in the atmo-
sphere includes regions IV and V . The outer WBL extends to the height h
λ p .Itis
here that the dominant-wave-induced pressure oscillations and therefore the wave-induced
momentum flux are felt. The 'dominant wave' scale in this scenario is determined by
ω<ω r .
The meaning of the
w
0
.
1
ω>ω r play a role in
the internal WBL sublayer V . These short waves form the local roughness parameter and
the tangential stress (9.19) . The height of this layer
ω r scale now becomes clearer as frequencies
ζ t is linked to the oscillating surface
rather than to the mean water level.
Layer III is the part of WBL where stratification effects become important as described
by the Monin-Obukhov theory (see (3.19) and Section 3.1 ). In the case of neutral stratifi-
cation, the profile here is logarithmic, and the roughness parameter is defined by the waves
and the friction drag. Since h w is usually much smaller than the Monin-Obukhov scale L ,
stratification effects can be neglected in layers I and II . At the upper-boundary height h s
of the Monin-Obukhov layer III , Coriolis force has to be introduced.
Search WWH ::




Custom Search