Geoscience Reference
In-Depth Information
Table 1.5. Values of S
r
/
σ
vo
and q
c1Ncs
-
Sr
obtained forpublished case historiesof liquefaction flow failures
Casehistory
Values for cases publishedby
Number
Structure
Seed (1987)
Seed and Harder (1990)
Olson and Stark (2002)
FC(%) q
c1Ncs
-
Sr
S
r
/
σ
vo
q
c1Ncs
-
Sr
S
r
/
σ
vo
S
r
/
σ
vo
q
c1Ncs
-
Sr
1
Wachusett Dam - NorthDike
5
51.8
0.106
2
Lower San Fernando Dam
25
85.5
0.215
80.2
0.115
72.0
0.112
3
FortPeck Dam
50
70.6
0.082
67.5
0.048
75.2
0.078
4
Calaveras Dam
60
74.1
0.117
74.1
0.101
75.1
0.112
5
Hachiro-Gata Road Embankment
15
45.0
0.062
6
Lake Ackerman Highway Embankment
0
25.7
0.076
7
Route 272 atHigashiarckinai
20
58.4
0.097
8
RiverBank, Lake Merced
3
40.5
0.073
48.0
0.073
9
Kawagishi-cho
3
33.2
0.081
32.8
0.081
10
Mochi-koshiTailings Dam - Dike 2
85
57.9
0.229
55.0
0.229
11
La Marquesa Dam - U/SSlope
30
51.0
0.220
12
La Marquesa Dam - D/SSlope
20
73.1
0.400
13
La Palma Dam
15
35.4
0.253
14
Uetsu Railway Embankment
2
25.5
0.027
25.5
0.031
25.5
0.028
15
Solfatara Canal Dike
7
40.8
0.208
33.2
0.080
16
Koda Numa Railway Embankment
13
26.3
0.103
26.3
0.103
34.9
0.052
17
Shibecha-cho Embankment
25
56.6
0.087
18
Sheffield Dam
40
50.6
0.035
50.6
0.053
