Geoscience Reference
In-Depth Information
12
Data points from Suzuki et al (1998) for
(N) 78
5; [(N) 60
5]
£
£ 6.
5 £ (N) 78 < 10; [6.5 £ (N) 60 < 13]
10
10
£
(N) 78 < 20; [13
£
(N) 60 < 26]
Approximate trend for :
8
Average (N) 60
20
Average (N) 60
10
6
Average (N) 60 4
4
2
0
0
20
40
60
80
100
Fines Content, FC (%)
) 60 as afunction of fines content
(data points from Suzuki et al., 1998 adjusted by a factor of 78/60 to account for energy
delivered toSPT sampler)
Fig. 1.11. Variations of the ratioq cN /(
N
varied systematically with fines content and D R (or N). This is illustrated in Figure 1.11
showing their data in terms of q cN /(
N
) 60 versus fines content, FC, for three ranges of
(
) 60 values. Their SPT blow count data most likely corresponded to an energy ratio
of about 78%, and hence were adjusted to an equivalent energy ratio of 60% to obtain
the
N
) 60 values presented in Figure 1.11. The three sets of data points presented in
Figure1.11arefor
(
N
(
N
) 60 <
6
.
5(average
4),for
(
N
) 60 rangingfrom6.5to13(average
(
) 60 ranging from13 to26(average
10), and for
N
20).
(
) 60 <
.
The data points for
5 covered a sufficient range of fines contents to enable
construction of a reasonable relationship between q cN /(
N
6
N
) 60 and fines content for an
average
) 60 of4. AlsoshowninFigure 1.11arerelationships thatwerederived forthe
other two ranges of
(
N
(
N
) 60 and which follow the form derived for
(
N
) 60 =
4. These three
relationships were used, with interpolation, to estimate q cN /(
N
) 60 ratios for different
values of
) 60 and fines content.
Fines content adjustments,
(
N
q c1N - Sr , for CPT penetration resistances were derived to
be consistent with those adopted for the SPT-based approach. The resulting values for
q c1N - Sr arelistedinTable 1.3.
CPT penetration resistances were estimated for each of the case histories listed in
Table1.1asfollows.Valuesofq c1N wereestimatedbymultiplyingtheSPT
(
N 1 ) 60 values
Search WWH ::




Custom Search