Geoscience Reference
In-Depth Information
BorcherdtRD(1994)EstimatesofSiteDependentResponseSpectraforDesign(Methodologyand
Justification).Earthquake Spectra 10(4):617-654
BSSC—Building Seismic Safety Council (2001) NEHRP (National Earthquake Hazards Reduc-
tion Program) Recommended Provisions for Seismic Regulations for New Buildings and other
Structures, Part 1: Provisions(FEMA 368), Washington, D.C.
Cetin KO, Seed RB, Der Kiureghian A, Tokimatsu K, Harder LF, Kayen RE, Moss RES (2004)
Standard Penetration Test-Based Probabilistic and Deterministic Assessment of Seismic Soil
Liquefaction Potential. ASCE, JGGE130(12):1314-1340
Deodatis D (1996) Non-stationary Stochastic Vector Processes: Seismic Ground Motion Applica-
tions.Probabilistic Eng.Mechanics 11:145-168
DurukalE,AnsalA,TonukG(2005)EffectofGroundMotionScalinginSiteResponseAnalyses.
Proc. Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering Satellite Conference, 16th ICSMGE,Osaka, Japan
Durukal E, Ansal A, Tonuk G (2006) Effect of Ground Motion Scaling and Uncertainties in Site
Characterisation on Site Response Analyses. Proc. 100th Anniversary Earthquake Conference
Commemoratingthe 1906San Francisco Earthquake, San Francisco, USA
ErdikM,DemirciogluM,SesetyanK,DurukalE,SiyahiB(2004)EarthquakeHazardinMarmara
Region. Soil Dynamics Earthquake Eng.24:605-631
Erdik M, Fahjan Y (2005) System Analysis and Risk. Assessing and Managing Earthquake Risk
Geo-scientific and Engineering Knowledge for Earthquake Risk Mitigation: Developments,
Tools, Techniques, Part 3, Book Series: Geotechnical, Geological, and Earthquake Engineering,
V2, Oliveira CS, Roca A,Goula X (eds)
Erdik M, Demircioglu M, Sesetyan K, Durukal E (2005) Assessment of earthquake hazard
for Bakirkoy, Gemlik, Bandırma, Tekirda
˘
gandKorfez. WB MEER Project—A3 Component,
Microzonation and Hazard Vulnerability Studies for Disaster Mitigation in Pilot Municipalities,
Bogazici University, Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Engineering Research Institute
Idriss IM, Sun JI (1992) Shake91, A Computer Program for Conducting Equivalent Linear Seis-
mic Response Analysis of Horizontally Layered Soil Deposits Modified based on the original
SHAKE program Published in December 1972 by Schnabel, Lysmer and Seed
IdrissIM,BoulangerRW(2003)Semi-EmpiricalProceduresforEvaluatingLiquefactionPotential
During Earthquakes. Proc. 11th ICSDEE,pp 32-56
Iwasaki T, Tokida K, Tatsuoka F, Watanabe S, Yasuda S, Sato H (1982) Microzonation of Soil
Liquefaction Potential Using Simplified Methods. Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Microzonation, Seattle
3:1319-1330
Joyner WB, Boore DM (1988) Measurement, characterization, and prediction of strong ground
motion. Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics II—Recent Advances in Ground Motion
Evaluation, ASCEGeotech. Spl.Pub. 20, pp 43-102
KavazanjianEJr,RothRA,EchezuriaH(1985)LiquefactionpotentialmappingforSanFrancisco.
J.Geotech. Eng. ASCE111(l):54-76
KılıcH, OzenerPT,AnsalA,YıldırımM, OzaydınK,AdatepeS(2006)MicrozonationofZeytin-
burnu Regionwith Respect to Soil Amplification: A CaseStudy. J. Eng. Geology 86:238-255
Papageorgiou A, Halldorsson B, Dong G (2000) Target Acceleration Spectra Compatible Time
Histories. University of Buffalo, Dept. of Civil, Structural and Environmental Eng. NY,
http://civil.eng.buffalo.edu/engseislab/
PEER(2006) Strong MotionData Bank, http://peer.berkeley.edu.
SeedHB,IdrissIM(1971)SimplifiedProcedureforEvaluatingSoilLiquefactionPotential.ASCE
J.Soil Mechanics Foundations Div. 97:1249-1273
