Geoscience Reference
In-Depth Information
r
+
2 F
∂ϕ
2 F
1
r
F
r 2
1
2 +
= 0 ,
(2.43)
z 2
r
r
while the boundary conditions (2.30) and (2.31) remain intact.
For resolving equation (2.43) we apply the traditional method of variable sepa-
ration, i.e. we shall assume that
F ( r ,
ϕ
, z )= R ( r )
Φ
(
ϕ
) Z ( z ) .
(2.44)
Substitution of expression (2.44) into equation (2.43) results in the following set of
ordinary differential equations:
2 R
r + r 2
n 2 R = 0 ,
r 2
+ r
R
(2.45)
r 2
2
Φ
∂ϕ
2 + n 2
Φ
= 0 ,
(2.46)
2 Z
k 2 Z = 0 .
z 2
(2.47)
The Bessel equation (2.45) is written with account of the substitution of variable
r
= rk (the asterisk '*' is dropped). The solutions of equations (2.45)-(2.47) are
well known and can be written as follows:
R ( rk )= C 1 J n ( kr )+ C 2 Y n ( kr ) ,
Φ
(
ϕ
)= C 3 cos( n
ϕ
)+ C 4 sin( n
ϕ
) ,
Z ( z )= C 5 cosh( kz )+ C 6 sinh( kz ) ,
where J n and Y n are Bessel functions of the first and second kinds and of the n th
order, C i are arbitrary constants.
Functions
Φ
(
ϕ
) must satisfy the periodicity condition:
Φ
ϕ
Φ
ϕ
π
) ,
(
)=
(
+ 2
from which it follows that parameter n is an integer, n = 0 ,
2 ,... The condi-
tion, that function R ( rk ) be limited at r = 0 requires the coefficient of the Bessel
function of the second kind to be equal to zero: C 2 = 0.
Thus, it is expedient to seek for the general solution of the problem in the form of
a Fourier expansion and of Laplace and Fourier-Bessel transformations [Nikiforov,
Uvarov (1984)]:
±
1 ,
±
, z , t )=
s + i
F ( r ,
ϕ
d k
d p
s i
0
J 0 ( kr ) C 3
2 C 5 ( p , k ) cosh( kz )+ C 6 ( p , k ) sinh( kz )
×
exp
{
pt
}
Search WWH ::




Custom Search