Integrated Assessment - A Companion to Environmental Geography - page 368

3. A strong technical argument is made in Oreskes, N. K., Shrader-Frechette, K. and Belitz,
K. (1994) Verifi cation, validation and confi rmation of numerical models in the earth
sciences. Science. , 263, 641-46.
4. For a review of the different forms of science, see Funtowicz, S. O. and Ravetz, J. R.
(1985) Three types of risk assessment: a methodological analysis . In C. Whipple and V.
Covello (eds), Risk Analysis in the Private Sector. New York: Plenum.
5. The implications for Environmental Assessment are explored in Farrell, A., VanDeever,
S. D. and Jaeger, J. (2001) Environmental assessment: four under-appreciated elements
of design. Global Environmental Change , 11, 311-33.
6. Young, R. A. (2001) Uncertainty and the Environment. Northhampton, MA: Edward
Elgar.

7. There is an extensive literature on this topic including Schrecker, T. (1984) Law Reform

Commission of Canada. Ottawa, pp. 112 and Jasanoff, S. and Wynne., B. (1998.) Science
and decisionmaking . In S. Rayner and E. Malone (eds), Human Choice and Climate
Change, Vol. 1. Columbus: Battelle Press, pp. 1-87.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Beck, U. (1992) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity . London: Sage.
Carmichael, J., Tansey, J. and Robinson, J. (2004) Georgia basin quest: an integrated assess-
ment modelling tool. Global Environmental Change , 14(2), 171-83.
Dreborg, K. (1996) Essence of backcasting . Futures , 28(9), 813-28.
Green, K. and Vergragt, P. (2002) Towards sustainable households: a methodology for
developing sustainable technological and social innovations . Futures , 34, 381-400.
Jasanoff, S. and Wynne, B. (1998) Science and decisionmaking . In S. Rayner and E. Malone
(eds), Human Choice and Climate Change, Vol. 1. Columbus: Battelle Press, 1-87.
Kasemir, B., Dahinden, U., Swartling, A., Schüle, R., Tabara, D. and Jaeger, C. (2000) Citi-
zens' perspectives on climate change and energy use. Global Environmental Change -
Human and Policy Dimensions , 10(3), 169-84.
Morgan, M. G., Kandlikar, M., Risbey, J. and Dowlatabadi, H. (1999) Why conventional
tools for policy analysis are often inadequate for problems of global change . Climatic
Change , 41, 271-81.
Oreskes, N. K., Shrader-Frechette, K. and Belitz, K. (1994) Verifi cation validation, and con-
fi rmation of numerical models in the Earth sciences. Science , 263, 641-46.
Parson, E. A. and Fisher-Vanden, K. (1997) integrated assessment models of global climate
change. Edited by R. H. Socolow, D. Anderson and J. Harte. Annual Review of Energy
and the Environment , 22, 589-628.
Quist, J. N. (2003) Greening Foresighting Through Backcasting: More Than Looking Back
from the Future. Sheffi eld: Greener Management International.
Robinson, J. (2003) Future subjunctive: backcasting as social learning . Futures , 35,
839-56.
Rotmans, J. (1998) Methods for IA: the challenges and opportunities ahead. Environmental
Modelling and Assessment , 3(3), 155-79.
Rotmans, J. and Dowlatabadi, H. (1998) Integrated assessment modelling. In S. Rayner and
E. L. Malone (eds), Human Choice and Climate Change , Vol. 3: The Tools for Policy
Analysis. Washington, DC: Battelle Press, pp. 292-377.
Shaw, A. and Robinson, J. (2004) Relevant but not prescriptive: science policy models within
the IPCC. Philosophy Today , 48(5/5; Supplement: Toward a Philosophy of Science Policy:
Approaches and Issues), 84-95.
Sigman, D. M. and Boyle, E. A. (2000) Glacial/interglacial variations in atmospheric carbon
dioxide. Nature , 407, 859-69.