Geoscience Reference
In-Depth Information
of the resistance (see equations 12.3 and 12.10):
R
d
=
R/
R
and
R
=
B
2
(( + 2)
c
ud
s
c
i
c
+
q
0
d
) =
B
2
(5.14
c
ud
(1.2)(1) +
q
0
d
), and
c
ud
= cu/
M
and
q
0
d
= q
0
/
R
. Next, the
safety condition
S
d
<
R
d
is checked for the various design approaches.
DA1/1
S
d
= 1.35(1027) + 1.5(180) = 1656 (kN)
c
ud
= 30 / 1.0
= 30 kPa
q
0
d
= (18 / 1.0) (0.5 + 0.5) = 18 kPa
R
d
=
R
/ 1.0 = (65.1(30) + 10.65(18) = 2145 kN
The requirement
S
d
< R
d
is amply satisfied (over-design of 29.5%).
DA2/2
S
d
= 1.0(1027) + 1.3(180) = 1261 kN
c
ud
=
30 / 1.4
= 21.4 kPa
q
0
d
= (18 / 1.4) (0.5 + 0.5) = 12.8 kPa
R
d
=
R
/ 1.0 = 65.1(21.4) + 10.65(12.8) = 1529 kN
The requirement
S
d
< R
d
is amply satisfied (over-design of 21.3%).
DA2
S
d
= 1.35(1027) + 1.5(180) = 1656 (kN)
c
ud
=
30 / 1.0
= 30 kPa
q
0
d
= (18 / 1.0) (0.5 + 0.5) = 18 kPa
R
d
=
R
/ 1.4 = (65.1(30) + 10.65(18)) / 1.4 = 1532 kN
The requirement
S
d
< R
d
is not satisfied (under-design of 7.5%).
DA3
S
d
= 1.35(1027) + 1.5(180) = 1656 (kN)
c
ud
=
30 / 1.4
= 21.4 kPa
q
0
d
= (18 / 1.0) (0.5 + 0.5) = 18 kPa
R
d
=
R
/ 1.0 = 65.1(21.4) + 10.65(18) = 1585 kN
The requirement
S
d
<
R
d
is not satisfied (under-design of 4.3%).
The design does not satisfy the DA2 and DA3. A wider footing will do. Which
one?
Search WWH ::
Custom Search