Geoscience Reference
In-Depth Information
Reptiliomorpha
Amphibia
268.0
270.6
270.6
275.6
275.6
Roadian
Kungurian
Artinskian
284.4
284.4
Sakmarian
294.6
294.6
299.0
299.0
303.9
303.9
306.5
306.5
Asselian
Gzhelian
Kasimovian
Moscovian
311.7
311.7
Bashkirian
318.1
318.1
Serpukhovian
326.4
326.4
Amphibia
Amphibia
Amphibia
Amphibia
Tetrapoda
Tetrapoda
Tetrapoda
Tetrapoda
Tetrapoda
Visean
Move onto land?
345.3
345.3
Tournaisian
Loss of caudal lepidotrichia
Appearance of pentadactyly
359.2
359.2
Famennian
374.5
374.5
Appearance of the limbs
Frasnian
Stegocephali
Stegocephali
Stegocephali
Stegocephali
Stegocephali
385.3
385.3
Givetian
391.8
391.8
Eifelian
397.5
397.5
Emsian
407.0
407.0
411.2
411.2
416.0
Pragian
Lochkovian
Tetrapodomorpha
Tetrapodomorpha
Tetrapodomorpha
Tetrapodomorpha
Tetrapodomorpha
Fig. 3. Time-calibrated supertree of sarcopterygians emphasizing early tetrapodomorphs showing the evolution of
habitat according to traditional interpretations. White: marine; grey (green in the electronic version): brackish water;
black: freshwater. States were ordered. The phylogeny was compiled using the Stratigraphic Tools (Josse et al. 2006)
for Mesquite 2.01 (Maddison & Maddison 2007) using the geological timescale of Gradstein et al. (2004) with trees and
taxonomies from Smithson (1980), Foreman (1990), Laurin (1998a, c), Beaumont & Smithson (1998), Laurin et al.
(2000), Zhu et al. (2001), Ruta et al. (2002, 2007), Zhu & Yu (2002), Anderson et al. (2003), Laurin (2004), Lebedev
(2004), Long & Gordon (2004), Vallin & Laurin (2004), Clack & Finney (2005), Laurin & Soler-Gij´n (2006), Clack
(2007) and Ruta & Coates (2007).
that interpretation, most stegocephalian remains are
interpreted as autochtonous elements which were
not transported far from their habitat. This character
includes a strong phylogenetic signal ( p , 0.0001).
This optimization differs from the former in that the
move from a marine environment to a marginal
marine environment probably took place in the
smallest clade which includes panderichthyids and
stegocephalians. That marginal marine environment
appears to have been the cradle of stegocephalian
diversification,
taphonomic artefact (this is the environment into
which most fossiliferous sediments in which stego-
cephalians could be preserved were deposited).
There is little evidence that some early stegoce-
phalian species were freshwater stenohaline forms,
although this could reflect the same taphonomic
artefact and could result from the difficulty of
demonstrating the freshwater nature of a locality.
If we take this evidence at face value, the relative
intolerance of most lissamphibians to moderately
saline brackish (more than about 10‰) water or
although
that
may
well
be
a
Search WWH ::




Custom Search