Electromagnetic Induction Methods - Agricultural Geophysics - page 128

easily implemented in the field. The EM technique is highly adaptable to a variety of mobile plat-
forms (handheld, vehicle mounted, or airborne) and does not require direct contact with the ground.
Interpretation can range from simple visual inspection of the data to more complex geophysical
inversion to determine the depth and size of the object causing the anomaly.
RefeRenCeS
Balanis, C.A., 1989, Advanced Engineering Electromagnetics , John Wiley & Sons, New York, 981 pp.
Cressie, N., 1993, Statistics for Spatial Data, revised edition , Wiley, New York, 900 pp.
Geonics Limited, (date unknown), Applications of “Dipole-Dipole” Electromagnetic Systems for Geological
Depth Sounding , Geonics Ltd. Technical Note TN-31, www.geonics.com/pdfs/technicalnotes/tn31.pdf.
Halliday, D., and Resnick, R., 1960, Physics (parts I and II): John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1214 pp.
Keller, G.V., and Frischknecht, F.C., 1966, Electrical Methods in Geophysical Prospecting : International
Series in Electromagnetic Waves, V. 10, Pergamon Press, New York, 517 pp.
Morse, P.M., and Feshbach, H., 1953, Methods of Theoretical Physics (Vol. I & II): McGraw-Hill, New York,
1978 pp.
Odgers, T., 2007, Gridding and Contouring Tutorial, www.geoafrica.co.za/contouring/contour_tutorial_
gridding_methods.htm.
Stratton, J., 1941, Electromagnetic Theory , McGraw-Hill, New York, 615 pp.
Ward, S.H., and Hohmann, G.W., 1987, Electromagnetic Theory for Geophysical Applications: Electromag-
netic Methods in Applied Geophysics, Vol. I, Investigations in Geophysics , Society of Exploration Geo-
physicists, Tulsa, OK, pp. 131-311.