Geoscience Reference
In-Depth Information
outputs belongs to this excellence frontier. Otherwise, it is said to be inef
cient and
receives a score of relative ef
ciency determined by the quotient between such
productivity ratios.
There are two classic models in DEA. The
first is called CCR, in reference to
Charnes et al. ( 1978 ). The second, called BCC, was proposed by Banker et al.
( 1984 ). Later successive developments led to the construction of a series of DEA
models, considering, for instance, restrictions to the vector of weights, as well as
randomness. However, when establishing a setup to combine probabilistic prefer-
ences, it is convenient to not deviate from a
fixed pattern. For this reason, only the
two general optimization procedures of the CCR and BCC models will be
employed here in the probabilistic composition of criteria.
In both these procedures, the distance from the vector of values of the inputs and
outputs in the alternative being evaluated to a piecewise linear frontier generated by
linearly combining observed inputs of other alternatives is minimized. In the BCC
approach, the coef
cients of the linear combinations that form the frontier are
forced to sum to 1. In the CCR approach, they can present a sum smaller than 1.
This
cients of the CCR model corresponds to
allowing for introducing in the composition of the frontier an alternative of null
inputs and null outputs. This is equivalent to allow for reducing the use of inputs
and production of outputs in any unit in the frontier on a proportional basis, as if
returns to scale were constant.
In the BCC model, the frontier of excellence is formed only by points inter-
mediary between those representing observed alternatives. That means that the
scores of ef
flexibility in the sum of coef
ciency of the alternatives cannot be reduced by comparison to
fictitious
production units of smaller dimensions.
The ef
ciency of each alternative is calculated by solving an optimization
problem proper for that alternative. The CCR optimization problem has as objective
function to maximize the quotient between the ef
ciency ratio of that alternative
and the best ef
ciency ratio with the same multipliers in the entire set of alterna-
tives. By
fixing the value 1 for the linear combination of the inputs that constitutes
the denominator of the ratio, this fractionary optimization problem can be formu-
lated in the following linear form:
X
Maximize
h ao ¼
l r O rao
r
subject to
X
m s Is ao ¼
1
;
s
X
X
l r O ra
m s I sa
0
for every alternative a
from 1 to n
;
;
r
a
l r [
0 and
m s [
0 for all r and s
;
Search WWH ::




Custom Search