Geoscience Reference
In-Depth Information
Geochemical Signature for Au
mapid : hmn4
Legend
less favourable basins
more favourable basins
no data
20 km
Weight for feature present w+ = 1.0047
Weight for feature absent w− = 1.0047
No data for feature
w = 0
Fig. 5.4 Ternary pattern for geochemical signature (binary pattern for presence or absence of
favorable geochemistry plus binary pattern unknown) (Source: Bonham-Carter et al. 1988 ,Fig.2a)
If there is no spatial correlation between deposit points and map pattern:
p d p b
p d
p b
ðÞ
ðÞ
p b p d
p b p d
P ¼
where p ( b ) is proportion of study area occupied by map layer B , p ( d ) is total number
of deposits divided by total area, and with similar explanations for the other pro-
portions. A chi-square test for goodness of fit can be applied to test the hypothesis
that there is no spatial correlation between deposit points and map pattern. It is
equivalent to using the z -test to be described in the next paragraph. The variance of
the contrast C
W +
W is:
¼
1
nbd
1
nbd þ
1
n bd þ
1
n b d :
2 C
˃
ðÞ ¼
ðÞ þ
The subject of asymptotic estimates of variances will be discussed in more detail
in Sect. 5.1.4 .
Table 5.1 shows weights and contacts with their standard deviations for nine
binary or ternary map layers used in a subsequent application of WofE to Meguma
Terrain gold deposits (Bonham-Carter et al. 1990 ). Halifax Formation and Devo-
nian granite were not used in this WofE application because almost no occurrences
Search WWH ::




Custom Search