Geoscience Reference
In-Depth Information
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
2
d
2
L
dS
2
dL
dS
S
2
1
2
S
2
@
A
S=2
@
A
þ
@
A
S=2
@
A
L
2
L
S=2
ᄐ
þ
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
3
4
d
3
L
dS
3
d
4
L
dS
4
1
6
S
2
1
24
S
2
@
A
@
A
@
A
@
A
þ
þ
,
S=2
S=2
0
@
1
A
0
@
1
A
þ
0
@
1
A
0
@
1
A
2
d
2
L
dS
2
dL
dS
S
2
1
2
S
2
L
1
L
S=2
ᄐ
þ
S=2
S=2
0
@
1
A
0
@
1
A
0
@
1
A
0
@
1
A
3
4
d
3
L
dS
3
d
4
L
dS
4
1
6
S
2
1
24
S
2
þ
þ:
S=2
S=2
Subtracting the above two equations from each other gives:
d
3
L
dS
3
dL
dS
1
24
S
3
l
ᄐ
L
2
L
1
ᄐ
S
þ
þ:
S=2
S=2
In like manner, we can obtain the formulae for differences in geodetic latitude
and azimuth. Combining them with the above expression yields:
0
@
1
A
2
0
@
1
A
2
9
=
d
3
L
dS
3
dL
dS
1
24
S
3
l
ᄐ
L
2
L
1
ᄐ
S
þ
þ
0
@
1
A
2
0
@
1
A
2
d
3
B
dS
3
dB
dS
1
24
S
3
b
ᄐ
B
2
B
1
ᄐ
S
þ
þ
:
ð
5
:
71
Þ
;
0
@
1
A
2
0
@
1
A
2
d
3
A
dS
3
dA
dS
1
24
180
o
S
3
a
ᄐ
A
2
A
1
ᄐ
S
þ
þ
where the subscript S/2 indicates that the derivatives of various orders in the bracket
will be taken according to the geodetic latitude B
S/2
and geodetic azimuth A
S/2
at the
midpoint of the geodesic P
S/2
.In(
5.71
), although only two terms are listed, the
accuracy actually reaches S
4
terms. Thus, it converges more rapidly than the
Legendre series. In (
5.71
), the geodetic latitude B
S/2
and geodetic azimuth A
S/2
are actually unknown, so the equation cannot be solved directly, and we need to
convert the derivatives of the equation. Assume that:
Search WWH ::
Custom Search