Geoscience Reference
In-Depth Information
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
2
d 2 L
dS 2
dL
dS
S
2
1
2
S
2
@
A S=2
@
A þ
@
A S=2
@
A
L 2
L S=2
þ
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
3
4
d 3 L
dS 3
d 4 L
dS 4
1
6
S
2
1
24
S
2
@
A
@
A
@
A
@
A
þ
þ
,
S=2
S=2
0
@
1
A
0
@
1
A þ
0
@
1
A
0
@
1
A
2
d 2 L
dS 2
dL
dS
S
2
1
2
S
2
L 1
L S=2
þ
S=2
S=2
0
@
1
A
0
@
1
A
0
@
1
A
0
@
1
A
3
4
d 3 L
dS 3
d 4 L
dS 4
1
6
S
2
1
24
S
2
þ
þ:
S=2
S=2
Subtracting the above two equations from each other gives:
d 3 L
dS 3
dL
dS
1
24
S 3
l
L 2
L 1
S
þ
þ:
S=2
S=2
In like manner, we can obtain the formulae for differences in geodetic latitude
and azimuth. Combining them with the above expression yields:
0
@
1
A 2
0
@
1
A 2
9
=
d 3 L
dS 3
dL
dS
1
24
S 3
l
L 2
L 1
S
þ
þ
0
@
1
A 2
0
@
1
A 2
d 3 B
dS 3
dB
dS
1
24
S 3
b
B 2
B 1
S
þ
þ
:
ð
5
:
71
Þ
;
0
@
1
A 2
0
@
1
A 2
d 3 A
dS 3
dA
dS
1
24
180 o
S 3
a
A 2
A 1
S
þ
þ
where the subscript S/2 indicates that the derivatives of various orders in the bracket
will be taken according to the geodetic latitude B S/2 and geodetic azimuth A S/2 at the
midpoint of the geodesic P S/2 .In( 5.71 ), although only two terms are listed, the
accuracy actually reaches S 4 terms. Thus, it converges more rapidly than the
Legendre series. In ( 5.71 ), the geodetic latitude B S/2 and geodetic azimuth A S/2
are actually unknown, so the equation cannot be solved directly, and we need to
convert the derivatives of the equation. Assume that:
Search WWH ::




Custom Search