Database Reference
In-Depth Information
Table 4-14. RAP VIII Recording Every 2 Hours
Checkpoint #
Checkpoint
Date
Checkpoint
Time
# of
Users
Checkpoint/
Verified
Component
# of Db
Servers
# of App
Servers
Description
Status
1
02/16/2011
8:00 am
100
N/A
6
8
Start of
RAP VIII
Success
2
02/16/2011
12:00 noon
100
Entire stack
6
8
Overall health
of the
environment
Good
. . . . . . . . .
8
02/17/2011
12 :00 noon
100
Entire stack
6
8
Archive log gaps
Apply process
behind compared
to the redo
switch rates
Warning
. . . . . . .
16
02/18/2011
12:00noon
100
Entire stack
6
8
Note: N/A = not available.
this report should be used for educational and reference purposes only. the report is not a complete report and
the results indicated may vary from environment to environment based on the configuration such as o/s, application, and
infrastructure being deployed.
Note
Conclusion
Testing cannot be ignored under any circumstances. As we discussed earlier, scalability and availability are the
primary benefits of moving to RAC configuration. What if these benefits cannot be achieved? What if the project is
deployed into production and the performance is worse than it was on a single instance non-RAC database? Maybe
the application cannot be made scalable and RAC maybe a bad choice or maybe RAC is not required to achieve
scalability. It cannot be stressed enough how important it is to test the RAC cluster. On several occasions, RAC
deployments have failed after moving into production because they have never been tested. RAP testing from Phase
I thru Phase VIII are allcritical and should be completed for a smooth transition from single instance to a clustered
scalable solution.
 
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search