Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
Representations with Regular 3 k -gons
6.2
We define the hexagonal grid
H m,n =( V H ,E H ) as a subgraph of the square grid
S m,n :
H m,n := V S ,E S \ ( v i,j ,v i +1 ,j ) ∈ E S ( i + j ) odd .
(a) (b)
Fig. 8. (a) Hexagonal Grid H 5 , 5 ; for thick edges, the moving sets are indicated by framed vertices
(b) UTriPCR ˆ of H 5 , 5 with illustration of modification step
Theorem 5. Every subgraph of the hexagonal grid
H m,n has a UTriPCR.
Proof. For the proof, we apply the already known technique. With ʵ ∈ (0 , 1),aUTriPCR
of
H m,n is given by the following mapping and depicted in Figure 8:
ˆ : V
3 )
ₒP
R
(
4 2 h + ʵ 3
2 h + ʵ 2 h
6 h + 4 1
if i + j even,
2 h + ʵ 2 h + 4 h + ʵ h else.
Analyzing the shifts of the characteristic corner, it is not hard to verify that ˆ is a
UTriPCR of the triangular grid with contact size cs ( ˆ )
4 2 h + ʵ 3
ˆ ( v i,j )=
6 h + 4 1
ʵ ) and has moving
(1
space sp ˆ ( u ) ( v ) ,d
ʵ for ( u,v )
E H and direction vectors d parallel to the
sides of the triangles.
Indeed, two types of edges and direction vectors suffice: For e =( v i,j ,v i,j +1 ),we
define direction d ( e ):=(
1
;
for e =( v i,j ,v i +1 ,j ), we define direction d ( e ):=(1 , 0) and moving set M ( e ):=
{
2 ,h ) and moving set M ( e ):=
{
v i,k
V
|
k>j
}
.Acrucial
property is that, again, the translation vector d ( e ) of an edge e is parallel to each of
the segments realizing contacts corresponding to edges of type ( u,v )
v i +1+ k,j−k
V
|
k
[ m
i ]
}∪{
v i +1+ k,j− 1 −k
V
|
k
[ m
i ]
}
E
\{
e
}
with
u
M ( e ). Moreover, d ( e ) is not parallel to the segment realizing
this contact in ˆ . Note also that each edgebelongstoatmost n moving sets with the
same translation direction. Therefore, choosing ʴ< n min
M ( e ) and v/
{
ʵ, 1
ʵ
}
the construction
analogous to Theorem 2 yields a UTriPCR for each subgraph G of
H m,n .
H m,n has a UPCR with regular
Corollary 4. Every subgraph of the hexagonal grid
3 k -gons, k ≥ 1 .
Proof. Note that 3 k -gons are pseudo-triangles with side length s k := tan( 3 k ) h . Choos-
ing ʵ< s 2 in the proof of Theorem 5, we obtain a UPCR ˆ for every subgraph G of
H m,n with cs ( ˆ ) > 1
s k . With this, the claim follows directly from Theorem 5 and
Lemma 1.
Search WWH ::




Custom Search