Information Technology Reference
Fig. 11. Task attendants' work performance under static and competency strategy
attendants' accumulative work performance under static strategy, while the blue curve
shows the task attendants' accumulative work performance under competency
As in Fig. 12, started from the beginning, the accumulative performance of
translators under competency strategy is always higher than the accumulative
performance of translators under static strategy. Therefore, the competency task
distribution strategy stimulated task attendants to finish the task earlier.
By statistics, the completion time of static strategy is 124343s and the average subtask
completion time is 62388.15s; while the completion time of competency strategy is
84940s. The efficiency of it is 124343s/84940s = 1.46 times of the efficiency under static
strategy. The average subtask completion time is 21956.44s, and its efficiency is
62388.15s/21956.44s =2.84 times of the efficiency under static strategy.
In addition, in Fig. 12, in both experiments there exists a period of lagging time. It
might due to the task attendants are not active or they might missed the advantageous
time of the competency strategy and lack motivation.
In future experiments, we should pay attention to the potential of task distribution
strategy improvement since different task distribution strategy does have great impact
on the efficiency.
Quality Influence of Task Distribution Strategy in PDCCP
In this experiment, we didn't prepare corresponding ground truth. Therefore, we used
human auditing the quality after the experiment.