Chemistry Reference
In-Depth Information
45. Q. Ma and J. A. Izaguirre, in
Proceedings of the 2003 ACM Symposium on Applied
Computing
, ACM, 2003, pp. 178-182. Long Time Step Molecular Dynamics Using
Targeted Langevin Stabilization.
46. R. D. Skeel and J. A. Izaguirre,
Mol. Phys.
,
100
, 3885 (2002). An Impulse Integrator for
Langevin Dynamics.
47. J. A. Izaguirre, in
Multiscale Computational Methods in Chemistry and Physics
, A. Brandt,
K. Binder, and J. Bernholc, Eds., IOS Press, Amsterdam, 2001, Vol. 177, pp. 34-47.
Langevin Stabilization of Multiscale Mollified Molecular Dynamics.
48. T. Schlick and L. Yang, in
Multiscale Computational Methods in Chemistry and Physics
,
A. Brandt, J. Bernholc, and K. Binder, Eds., Amsterdam, 2001, Vol. 177, pp. 293-305. Long-
Timestep Biomolecular Dynamics Simulations: Ln Performance on a Polymerase Beta / DNA
System.
49. L. Greengard and V. Rokhlin,
J. Comput. Phys.
,
73
, 325 (1987). A Fast Algorithm for Particle
Simulations.
50. A. W. Appel,
SIAM J. Sci. Stat. Comput.
,
6
, 85 (1985). An Efficient Program for Many-Body
Simulations.
51. J. Barnes and P. Hut,
Nature
,
324
, 446 (1986). A Hierarchical
O
(
N
log
N
) Force Calculation
Algorithm.
52. Z.-H. Duan and R. Krasny,
J. Comput. Chem.
,
21
, 1 (2000). An Adaptive Treecode for
Computing Nonbonded Potential Energy in Classical Molecular Systems.
53. T. Darden, D. York, and L. Pedersen,
J. Chem. Phys.
,
98
, 10089 (1993). Particle Mesh Ewald:
An
N
*log(
N
) Method for Computing Ewald Sums.
54. Z.-H. Duan and R. Krasny,
J. Chem. Phys.
,
113
, 3492 (2000). An Ewald Summation Based
Multipole Method.
55. R. W. Hockney and J. W. Eastwood,
Computer Simulation Using Particles
, McGraw-Hill,
New York, 1981.
56. P. Procacci and M. Marchi,
J. Chem. Phys.
,
104
, 3003 (1996). Taming the Ewald Sum in
Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Solvated Proteins via a Multiple Time Step Algorithm.
57. X. Qian and T. Schlick,
J. Chem. Phys.
,
116
, 5971 (2002). Efficient Multiple Timestep
Integrators with Distance-Based Force Splitting for Particle-Mesh-Ewald Molecular
Dynamics Simulations.
58. D. Barash, L. Yang, X. Qian, and T. Schlick,
J. Comput. Chem.
,
24
, 77 (2003). Inherent
Speedup Limitations in Multiple Timestep Particle Mesh Ewald Algorithms.
59. T. Hansson, C. Oostenbrink, and W. F. van Gunsteren,
Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.
,
12
, 190
(2002). Molecular Dynamics Simulations.
60. M. Karplus,
Acc.Chem. Res.
,
35
, 321 (2002).MolecularDynamics Simulations of Biomolecules.
61. M. Karplus and J. Kuriyan,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
,
102
, 6679 (2005). Molecular
Dynamics and Protein Function.
62. P. G. Bolhuis, D. Chandler, C. Dellago, and P. L. Geissler,
Annu. Rev. Phys. Chem.
,
53
, 291
(2002). Transition Path Sampling: Throwing Ropes over Rough Mountain Passes, in the
Dark.
63. P. G. Bolhuis, C. Dellago, and D. Chandler,
Faraday Discuss.
, 421 (1998). Sampling
Ensembles of Deterministic Transition Pathways.
64. T. S. van Erp, D. Moroni, and P. G. Bolhuis,
J. Chem. Phys.
,
118
, 7762 (2003). A Novel Path
Sampling Method for the Calculation of Rate Constants.
65. P. G. Bolhuis,
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
,
100
, 12129 (2003). Transition-Path Sampling of
Beta-Hairpin Folding.
66. T. S. van Erp and P. G. Bolhuis,
J. Comput. Phys.
,
205
, 157 (2005). Elaborating Transition
Interface Sampling Methods.
67. P. G. Bolhuis,
J. Phys.: Condens. Mat.
,
15
, S113 (2003). Transition Path Sampling on Diffusive
Barriers.
