XSET - Emerging Trends in Image Processing, Computer Vision, and Pattern Recognition - page 90

[11] Wang Z, Simoncelli E, Bovik A. Multiscale structural similarity for image quality as-
sessment. 1398-1402. Conference record of the thirty-seventh asilomar conference on signals,
systems and computers. 2003;2.
[12] Huynh-Thu Q, Ghanbari M. Scope of validity of PSNR in image/video quality assess-
ment. Electron Let. 2008;44(13):800-801.
[13] Sheikh H, Bovik A. Image information and visual quality. IEEE Trans Image Process.
2006;15(2):430-444.
[14] Wang Z, Bovik A, Sheikh H, Simoncelli E. Image quality assessment: from error visib-
ility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2004;13(4):600-612.
[15] Wang Z, Bovik A. A universal image quality index. IEEE Sig Process Let. 2002;9:81-84.
[16] Mitsa T, Varkur K. Evaluation of contrast sensitivity functions for formulation of qual-
ity measures incorporated in halftoning algorithms. 301-304. IEEE international confer-
ence on acoustics, speech and signal processing. 1993;vol. 5.
[17] S.I.P.I. of the University of Southern California. The USC-SIPI image database. Signal
and Image Processing Institute of the University of Southern California. [Online].
Available: htp://sipi.usc.edu/database/ ; 1997.
[18] le Callet P, Autrusseau F. Subjective quality assessment IRCCyN/IVC database.
htp://www.irccyn.ec-nantes.fr/ivcdb/ ; 2005.
[19] Taubman D. Kakadu software. [Online]. Available: htp://www.kakadusoftware.com/ ;
July 2010.
[20] Ponomarenko N, Lukin V, Zelensky A, Egiazarian K, Carli M, Batisti F. TID2008 -a
database for evaluation of fullreference visual quality assessment metrics. Adv Modern
Radioelect. 2009;10:30-45.