Chemistry Reference
In-Depth Information
An important recommendation is that research that focuses on cognitive or
affective features of learning in isolation needs to be supplemented by research
that explores instructional approaches and teaching innovations by simultaneously
considering both the learning that takes place and the learner experience.
References
Ainley, M. (2006). Connecting with learning: motivation, affect and cognition in interest pro-
cesses. Educational Psychology Review, 18 (4), 391-405. doi: 10.1007/s10648-006-9033-0 .
Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view . New York: Holt, Rinehart &
Winston.
Ausubel, D. P. (2000). The acquisition and retention of knowledge: A cognitive view . Dordrecht:
Kluwer.
Baddeley, A. D. (2003). Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews
Neuroscience, 4 (10), 829-839.
Bektas, O., & Taber, K. S. (2009). Can science pedagogy in English schools inform educational
reform in Turkey? Exploring the extent of constructivist teaching in a curriculum context
informed by constructivist principles. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 6 (3), 66-80.
Bickhard, M. H. (1998). Constructivism and relativism: A shoppers guide. In M. R. Matthews
(Ed.), Constructivism in science education: A philosophical examination (pp. 99-112).
Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Bloom, B. S. (1968). The cognitive domain. In L. H. Clark (Ed.), Strategies and tactics in
secondary school teaching: A topic of readings (pp. 49-55). London: Macmillan.
Bloom, B. S. (1972). Innocence in education. The School Review, 80 (3), 333-352. doi: 10.2307/
1084408 .
Bodner, G. M. (1986). Constructivism: A theory of knowledge. Journal of Chemical Education, 63
(10), 873-878.
Bodner, G. M., Klobuchar, M., Geelan, D. (2001). The many forms of constructivism. Journal of
Chemical Education 78 (Online Symposium: Piaget, Constructivism, and Beyond):1107.
Brock, R. (2006). Intuition and integration: Insights from intuitive students (M.Phil. thesis,
Faculty of Education. University of Cambridge, Cambridge).
Chalmers, A. F. (1982). What is this thing called science? (2nd ed.). Milton Keynes: Open
University Press.
Cole, R., Becker, N., Towns, M., Sweeney, G., Wawro, M., & Rasmussen, C. (2012). Adapting a
methodology from mathematics education research to chemistry education research:
documenting collective activity. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education,
10 (1), 193-211. doi: 10.1007/s10763-011-9284-1 .
Coll, R. K., & Taylor, T. G. N. (2001). Using constructivism to inform chemistry pedagogy.
Chemistry Education: Research & Practice in Europe, 2 (3), 215-226.
Collins, H. (2010). Tacit and explicit knowledge . Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Cornwall, M. (1987). The social bases of religion: A study of factors influencing religious belief
and commitment. Review of Religious Research, 29 (1), 44-56. doi: 10.2307/3511951 .
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention .
New York: HarperPerennial.
Driver, R. (1983). The pupil as scientist? Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific
knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23 (7), 5-12.
Driver, R., & Easley, J. (1978). Pupils and paradigms: A review of literature related to concept
development in adolescent science students. Studies in Science Education, 5 , 61-84.
Search WWH ::




Custom Search