Chemistry Reference
In-Depth Information
Hofstein, A., Navon, O., & Mamlok-Naaman, R. (2005). Developing students
ability to ask more
and better questions resulting from inquiry-type chemistry laboratories.
Journal of Research in
Science Teaching, 42
(7), 791-806.
Johnstone, A. H., & Selepeng, D. (2001). A language problem revisited.
Chemical Education
Research and Practice, 2
, 19-29.
Johnstone, A., & Wham, A. J. B. (1982). The demands of practical work.
Education in Chemistry,
3
, 71-73.
KMK. (2005).
Bildungsstandards im Fach Chemie f
'
€
ur den mittleren Bildungsabschluss Beschluss
vom 16.12.2004
. Neuwied: Luchterhand.
Korpan, C. A., Bisnaz, G. L., & Bisnaz, J. (1997). Assessing literacy in science: Evaluation of
scientific new briefs.
Science Education, 81
(5), 515-532.
Lee, O. (2001). Culture and language in science education: What do we know and what do we need
to know?
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38
, 499-501.
Lee, O. (2005). Science education with English language learners: Synthesis and research agenda.
Review of Educational Research, 75
, 491-530.
Lee, O., & Fradd, S. H. (1998). Science for all, including students from non-English language
backgrounds.
Educational Researcher, 27
, 12-21.
Lee, V., & Smith, J. B. (1995). Effects of high school restructuring and size on gains in
achievement and engagement for early secondary school students.
Sociology of Education,
68
, 241-247.
Lee, V., Smith, J., Croninger, J. B., & Robert, G. (1997). How high school organization influences
the equitable distribution of learning in mathematics and science.
Sociology of Education, 70
,
128-150.
Lee, O., Maaerten-Rivera, J., Buxton, C., Penfield, R., & Secada, W. G. (2009). Urban elementary
teachers
perspectives on teaching science to English language learners.
Journal of Science
Teacher Education, 20
, 263-286.
Lemke, J. (1989). Making test talk.
Theory Into Practice, 28
, 136-141.
Lynch, S. (2001). “Science for all” is not equal to “One size fits all”: Linguistic and cultural
diversity and science education reform.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38
, 622-627.
Markic, S. (2011).
Lesson plans for student language heterogeneity while learning about “matter
and its properties
. Paper presented at the 9th ESERA Conference, Lyon, FR. Retrieved June
Markic, S. (2012). Lesson plans for students language heterogeneity while learning science. In
S. Markic, D. di Fuccia, I. Eilks, & B. Ralle (Eds.),
Heterogeneity and cultural diversity in
science education and science education research
(pp. 41-52). Aachen: Shaker.
Markic, S., Broggy, J., & Childs, P. (2013). How to deal with linguistic issues in the chemistry
classroom. In I. Eilks & A. Hofstein (Eds.),
Teaching chemistry—a studybook
(pp. 127-152).
Rotterdam: Sense.
Moore, F. M. (2007). Language in science education as a gatekeeper to learning, teaching and
professional development.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 18
, 319-343.
Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching.
Journal of Curriculum Studies,
19
, 317-328.
Norris, S. P., & Philips, L. M. (1994). Interpreting pragmatic meaning when reading popular
reports on science.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31
, 947-964.
Norris, S. P., & Phillips, L. M. (2003). How literacy in its fundamental sense is central to scientific
literacy.
Science Education, 87
, 224-240.
NRC—National Research Council (1996) National science education standards. Washington,
National Academy
Pawan, F., & Ortloff, J. H. (2011). Sustaining collaboration: English-as-a-second-language and
content area teachers.
Teaching and Teacher Education, 27
, 463-471.
Penfield, J. (1987). ESL: The content-area classroom teacher
'
s perspective.
TESOL Quarterly, 21
,
'
21-39.
Search WWH ::
Custom Search