Chemistry Reference
In-Depth Information
H. Eberwein & S. Knauer (Eds.),
Handbuch Integrationsp
adagogik. Kinder mit und ohne
€
achtigung lernen gemeinsam
(Vol. 7, pp. 295-303). Weinheim und Basel: Beltz.
Maria, F., dos Santos, T., & Fleury Mortimer, E. (2003). How emotions shape the relationship
between a chemistry teacher and her high school students.
International Journal of Science
Education, 25
(9), 1095-1110.
Markic, S., & Abels, S. (2013). Die Fachsprache der Chemie. Ein gemeinsames Anliegen von
heterogenen Klassen [The terminology of chemistry. A joint concern of heterogenous classes].
Naturwissenschaften im Unterricht—Chemie, 24
(135), 10-14.
Martin-Hansen, L. (2002). Defining inquiry. Exploring the many types of inquiry in the science
classroom.
The Science Teacher, 69
(2), 34-37.
Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., Norland, J. J., Berkeley, S., McDuffie, K., Tornquist, E. H.,
et al. (2006). Differentiated curriculum enhancement in inclusive middle school science:
Effects on classroom and high-stakes tests.
Journal of Special Education, 40
(3), 130-137.
Mayring, P. (2007).
Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken [Qualitative content
analysis. Principles and techniques]
. Weinheim und Basel: Beltz.
Meier, R. (2000). An Experimentiertischen Ph
¨
nomene untersuchen [To investigate phenomenons
at experimental tables].
Grundschule Sachunterricht, 8
, 14-15.
Meijer, C. J. W. (2010). Special needs education in Europe: Inclusive policies and practices.
Zeitschrift f
Beeintr
€
ur Inklusion.
Retrieved June 17, 2011, from http://www.inklusion-online.net/index.
php/inklusion/article/view/56/60
National Research Council. (1996).
National science education standards
. Washington, DC:
National Academy Press.
National Research Council. (2000).
Inquiry and the national science education standards
.
Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
€
O
Hanlon, C. (2009). Using action research to support students with special educational needs. In
B. Somekh & S. E. Noffke (Eds.),
The Sage handbook of educational action research
(pp. 118-130). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
Patton, M. Q. (2011).
Developmental evaluation. Applying complexity concepts to enhance
innovation and use
. New York: The Guilford Press.
Postholm, M. B. (2008). Teachers developing practice: Reflection as key activity.
Teaching and
Teacher Education, 24
, 1717-1728.
Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (1995). Science and students with mental retardation: An
analysis of curriculum features and learner characteristics.
Science Education, 79
(3), 251-271.
Scruggs, T. E., & Mastropieri, M. A. (2007). Science learning in special education: The case for
constructed versus instructed learning.
Exceptionality, 15
(2), 57-74.
Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & Boon, R. (1998). Science education for students with
disabilities: A review of recent research.
Studies in Science Education, 32
, 21-44.
Scruggs, T. E., Mastropieri, M. A., & Okolo, C. M. (2008). Science and social studies for students
with disabilities.
Focus on Exceptional Children, 41
(2), 1-24.
Seidel, T., Prenzel, M., Rimmele, R., Schwindt, K., Kobarg, M., Herweg, C., et al. (2006).
Unterrichtsmuster und ihre Wirkungen. Eine Videostudie im Physikunterricht [Classroom
patterns and their effects. A video analysis in physics classes] Untersuchungen zur
Bildungsqualitat
'
von
Schule.
Abschlussbericht
des DFG-Schwerpunktprogramms
(pp. 99-123). M¨nster: Waxmann.
Senatsverwaltung f¨r Bildung, Jugend und Sport Berlin [Senate Department for Education, Youth and
Sports]. (2005).
Rahmenlehrplan f
adagogischen
Fo¨rderschwerpunkt Lernen (Berlin)
[Curriculum for students with the focal point of supporting
learning]. Retrieved Sep 30, 2011, from
http://www.berlin.de/imperia/md/content/sen-bildung/
ur Sch
€
€
ulerinnen und Sch
€
uler mit dem sonderp
€
¼
¼
Search WWH ::
Custom Search