Chemistry Reference
In-Depth Information
Lewontin, C., Rose, S., & Kamin, L. J. (1984).
Not in our genes. Biology, ideology, and human
nature
. New York: Pantheon.
McComas, W. F. (1998). The principal elements of the nature of science: Dispelling the myths. In
W. F. McComas (Ed.),
The nature of science in science education. Rationales and strategies
(pp. 53-69). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
Metzinger, T. (2000a). Auf der Suche nach einem neuen Bild des Menschen.
Spiegel der
Forschung, 17
(1), 58-67.
Metzinger, T. (2000b). Introduction: Consciousness research at the end of the twentieth century. In
T. Metzinger (Ed.),
Neural correlates of consciousness: Empirical and conceptual questions
.
Cambridge: MIT Press.
Mittelstraß, J. (1996).
Leonardo-Welt.
Uber Wissenschaft, Forschung und Verantwortung
. Frank-
furt am Main: Suhrkamp.
Monetha, S. (2009).
Alltagsphantasien, motivation und lernleistung
. Opladen: Barbara Budrich.
Nevers, P. (2009). Transcending the factual in biology by philosophizing with children. In G. Y.
Iversen, G. Mitchell, & G. Pollard (Eds.),
Hovering over the face of the deep: Philosophy,
theology and children
(pp. 147-160). M¨nster: Waxmann.
Nisbett, R. E., & Wilson, T. D. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental
processes.
Psychological Review, 84
, 231-259.
Oschatz, K. (2011).
Intuition und fachliches Lernen. Zum Verhaltnis von epistemischen
Uberzeugungen und Alltagsphantasien
. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
Oschatz, K., Gebhard, U., & Mielke, R. (2010). Alltagsphantasien und Irritation—Die Effekte der
Ber¨cksichtigung intuitiver Vorstellungen beim Nachdenken ¨ber Gentechnik. In U. Harms &
I. Mackensen-Friedrichs (Eds.),
Heterogenitat erfassen—individuell fo¨rdern im
Biologieuntericht: Lehr- und Lernforschung in der Biologiedidaktik (S
(pp. 55-70). Innsbruck:
StudienVerlag.
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986).
Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral
routes to attitude change
. New York: Springer.
Pfundt, H., & Duit, R. (1994).
Students
'
alternative frameworks and science education. Bibliog-
raphy
. Kiel: Institut f
¨
r die P
¨
dagogik der Naturwissenschaften.
Piaget, J. (1926).
La Repr ´sentation du monde chez l
'
enfant
. Paris: Alcan.
Ratcliffe, M., & Grace, M. (2003).
Science education for citizenship—Teaching socio-scientific
issues
. Maidenhead: Oxford University Press.
Reitschert, K., & H¨ßle, C. (2006). Competence of moral judgement in Biology lessons. How do
students judge problems of biomedical sciences? In: VIth Conference of ERIDOB, Institute of
Education, London.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic
motivation, social development, and well-being.
American Psychologist, 55
, 68-78.
Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing:
I. Detection, search, and attention.
Psychological Review, 84
, 1-66.
Smith, E. R., & DeCoster, J. (2000). Dual-process models in social and cognitive psychology:
Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems.
Personality and Social
Psychology Review, 4
(2), 108-131.
Snow, C. P. (1959).
The two cultures and the scientific revolution
. New York: Cambridge
University Press.
Strack, F., & Deutsch, R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior.
Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8
, 220-247.
Tobin, K. (2009). Tuning into others
voices: Radical listening, learning from difference, and
escaping oppression.
Cultural Studies of Science Education, 4
, 505-511.
Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences.
American Psycholo-
gist, 35
, 151-175.
Zeidler, D. L. (2003).
The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in
science education
. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
'
Search WWH ::
Custom Search