Models for Simulating the Seismic Response of Concrete Structures - Dynamic Behavior of Concrete and Seismic Engineering - page 263

3.0 3.0

EXPERIENCE
CALCULATION

EXPERIENCE
CALCUL

2.0 2.0

1.0 1.0

0.0 0.0

-1.0 -1.0

-2.0 -2.0

-3.0 -3.0

-4.0 -4.0

2.52 3.02 3.52 4.02 4.52 5.02 2.52 3.02 3.52 4.02 4.52 5.02 5.52 6.02 6.52 5.52 6.02 6.52

Time (s)

Figure 7.22. Calculation-test comparison: CAMUS III model, Melandy Ranch 1.35 g signal

Note that the collapse mode observed using the CAMUS I model could not be
predicted by elastic calculation. Moreover, due to the disruption caused by the shear
load, modeling based on a fiber model could not accurately reproduce this mode of
behavior. The CAMUS tests, together with the digital analysis carried out, have
shown the strong interaction that exists between the vertical and horizontal
directions of the vibration.

CAMUS I CAMUS I CAMUS II CAMUS II CAMUS III CAMUS III

Figure 7.23. Isovalues of the vertical strains in concrete