Risk Evaluation of Mercury Pollution - Mercury in the Environment - page 266

Tran, N.L., L. Barraj, K. Smith, A. Javier, and T.A. Burke. 2004.
Combining food frequency and survey data to quantify
long-term dietary exposure: a methylmercury case study.
Risk Analysis 24:19-30.
Ullrich, S.M., M.A. Ilyushchenko, T.W. Tanton, and G.A.
Uskov. 2007. Mercury contamination in the vicinity of
a derelict chlor-alkali plant. Part II: contamination of
the aquatic and terrestrial food chain and potential risks
to the local population. In Mercury contaminated sites:
characterization, risk assessment and remediation. Science of
the Total Environment 381:1-26.
USACOE, 1996. Risk assessment handbook . Volume II:
Environmental evaluations. EM200-14. Washington DC:
USACOE.
USDOE, 2009. Environmental justice at the U.S. Department of
Energy . www.lm.doe.gov/env_justice/ (accessed 8 Sept 2011).
USDOI, 1986. Natural resource damage assessments: fi nal: fi nal
rule . Federal Register 51:27646 -27753.
USEPA, 1986. Risk assessment guidelines for carcinogenicity,
mutagenicity, complex mixtures, suspect developmental
toxicants, and estimating exposures. Federal Register
51:33992 -34054.
USEPA. 1995. Integrated Risk Information System—Mercury,
elemental . http://www.epa.gov/iris/subst/0370.htm
USEPA, 1997. Ecological risk assessment guidance for superfund
process for designing and conducting ecological risk assessments.
Washington, DC: USEPA.
USEPA, 2001. Ecological risk assessment bulletins—supplement to
RAGS, region 4. Washington, DC: USEPA.
USEPA, 2001a. Freshwater criterion for fi sh . http://www.epa
.gov/fedgstr/EPA-WATER/2001/January/Day-08/w217.htm
(accessed 7 Jan 2011).
USEPA, 2001b. Integrated risk information system: methylmercury
MeHg . http://www.epa.gov/ncea/iris/subst/0073.htm
(accessed 14 Feb 2011).
USEPA, 2006. Integrated risk information system data base for
methylmercury . www.epa.gov/iris (accessed 20 Nov 2011).
USEPA, 2009a. Environmental justice: compliance and
enforcement . http://www.epa.gov/environmentaljustice
(accessed 30 July 2011).
USEPA, 2009b. Integrated risk information system: site help and
tools—glossary. http://www.epa.gov/iris/help_gloss.htm
(accessed 1 Jan 2011).
USEPA, 2010. Superfund risk assessment: human health: exposure
assessment . http://www.epa.gov/answer/riskassessment/
index.htm (accessed 1 Aug 2011).
USFDA, 2001. FDA consumer advisory. Washington, DC: U.S.
Food and Drug Administration. http//www.fda.gov/bbs/
topics/ANSWERS/2000/advisory.html (accessed December 1,
2001).
USFDA, 2003. FDA consumer advisory . Washington, DC: U.S.
Food and Drug Administration. http//www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/
ANSWERS/2000/advisory.html (1 January 1, 2004);2003.
USFDA, 2005. Mercury levels in commercial fi sh and shellfi sh.
Washington, DC: Food and Drug Administration. http//
www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/ANSWERS/2000/advisory.html
(accessed 1 January 1, 2005).
USFDA, 2006 (updated). Mercury concentrations in fi sh: FDA
monitoring program, 1990-2004. Washington, DC: U.S.
Food and Drug Administration. Available http//www.fda
.gov/~dms/admehg3.html. (accessed 2 December 2, 2007).

Van der Schalie, W.H., H.S. Gardner, J.A. Bantle, C.T. DeRose,
R.A. Finch, J.S. Reif, R. H. Reuter, L.C. Backer, J. Burger,
L.C. Folmar, and W.S. Stokes. 1999. Animals as sentinels
of human health hazards of environmental chemicals.
Environmental Health Perspectives 107:309-315.
Washburn, S.T., C.F. Kleiman, and D.E. Arsnow. 1998.
Applying USEPA risk assessment guidance in the 90s.
Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 4:763-774.
Watanabe, C., K. Yin, Y. Kasanuma, and H. Satoh. 1999.
In utero exposure to methylmercury and Se defi ciency
converge on the neurobehavioral outcome in mice.
Neurotoxicology and Teratology 21: 83-88.
Wendroff, A.P. 1995. Magico-religious mercury use and cultural
sensitivity. American Journal of Public Health 85:409-410.
Wheatley, B., and M.A. Wheatley. 2000. Methylmercury
and the health of indigenous peoples: a risk management
challenge for physical and social sciences, and for public
health policy. Science of the Total Environment 259:23-29.
WHO, 2005. Policy paper: mercury in health care . Geneva: World
Health Organization (WHO/SDE/WSH/05.08). http://www.
who.int/water_sanitation_health (accessed 7 Feb 2011).
WHO, 2007. Preventing disease through healthy
environments: exposure to mercury: a major public health
concern . World Health Organization Mercury Flyer. http://
www.who.int/phe/news/Mercury-fl yer.pdf (accessed 18 Jan
2011).
Wiegers, J.K., H.M. Feder, L.S. Mortensen, D.G. Shaw, V.J.
Wilson, and W.G. Landis. 1998. A regional multi-stressor
rank-based ecological risk assessment for the Fjord of
Port Valdez, Alaska. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment
4:1125-1173.
Willett, W.C. 2005. Balancing health risks and benefi ts.
American Journal of Preventive Medicine 29:321-321.
Williams, B.L., and M.S. Magsumbol. 2007. Emergency
preparedness among people living near U.S. Army chemical
weapons sites after September 11, 2001. American Journal of
Public Health 97:1601-1607.
Wilson, E.O. 1986. Biodiversity. Washington, DC: National
Academies Press.
Wilson, M.V., and L.E. Lantz. 2000. Issues and framework for
building successful science-management teams for natural
areas management. Natural Areas Journal 20:381-385.
Wolfe, M.F., T. Atkeson, W. Bowerman, J. Burger, D.C. Evers,
M. Murray, and E. Zillioux. 2006. Wildlife indicators. In:
Ecosystem responses to mercury contamination. Harris, R.
Krabbenhoft, D.P. Mason, R. Murray, M.W. Reash, R. and
Saltman, T. (eds.). Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press, pp. 123-190.
Zartarian, V.G., and B.D. Schultz. 2009. The EPA's human
exposure research program for assessing cumulative risk in
communities. Journal of Exposure Science and Environmental
Epidemiology , 2009:1-8.
Zeeman, M., and J. Gilford. 1993. Ecological hazard evaluation
and risk assessment under EPA's Toxic Substances Control
Act (TSCA): an introduction. In: Toxicology and risk
assessment. Landis, W.G. J.S. Hughes, and M.A. Lewis (eds.).
Philadelphia: American Society of Testing and Materials,
Vol. 1, pp. 7-21.
Zhang, H., X. Feng, T. Larrsen, T. Qiu, and R. Vogt. 2010. In
inland China, rice, rather than fi sh, is the major pathway
for methylmercury exposure. Environmental Health
Perspectives 118:1183 -1188.