Environmental Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
Gilbert, T.L. 1984. Problems of risk balancing for regulating
environmental hazards. U.S. Department of Energy
Technical Report. Washington DC: National Technical
Information Service. NTIS, PC A02/MF A01.
Ginsberg, G.I., and B.F. Toal. 2000. Development of a single-
meal fi sh consumption advisory for methylmercury. Risk
Analysis 20:41-47.
Gochfeld, M. 2003. Cases of mercury exposure, bioavailability,
and absorption. Ecotoxicology Environmental Safety 56:174-179.
Gochfeld, M., and J. Burger. 2005. Good fi sh/bad fi sh: a
composite benefi t-risk by dose curve. Neurotoxicology
26:511-520.
Gochfeld, M., and J. Burger. 2007. Environmental and ecological
risk assessment. In: Public health and preventive medicine.
Wallace, R.B. (ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill, pp. 545-562.
Goldblum, D.K., A. Rak, M.D. Ponnapalli, and C.J. Clayton.
2006. The Fort Totten mercury pollution risk assessment: a
case history. Journal of Hazardous Materials 136:406-417.
Grandjean, P., P. Weihe, R.F. White and F. Debes. 1998.
Cognitive performance of children prenatally exposed
to “safe” levels of methylmercury. Environmental Research
77:165-172.
Greenberg, M., J. Burger, M. Gochfeld, D. Kosson, K. Lowrie,
H. Mayer, C.W. Powers, C.D. Volz, and V. Vyas. 2005.
End-state land uses, sustainability protective systems,
and risk management: a challenge for remediation and
multigenerational stewardship. Remediation Winter:91-105.
Groth, E. III. 2010. Ranking the contribution of commercial
fi sh and shellfi sh varieties to mercury exposure in the
United States: implications for risk communication.
Environmental Research. doi:10.1016/j.envres.2009.12.006.
Harnly, M., S. Seidel, P. Rojas, R. Fornes, P. Flessel, D. Smith,
R. Dreutzer, and L. Goldman. 1997. Biological monitoring
for mercury within a community with soil and fi sh
contamination. Environmental Health Perspectives 105:424-429.
Harris, S.G., and B.L. Harper. 1997. A Native American exposure
scenario, and a tribal risk model. Risk Analysis 17:789-795.
Harris, R., D.P. Krabbenhoft, R. Mason, M.W. Murray, R. Reash,
and T. Saltman (eds.). 2006. Ecosystem responses to mercury
contamination. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Hays, S.M., R.A. Becker, H.W. Leung, L.L. Aylward, and D.W.
Pyatt. 2007. Biomonitoring equivalents: a screening
approach for interpreting biomonitoring results from
a public health perspective. Regulatory Toxicology and
Pharmacology 47:96-109.
He, Q.L., Z.F. Yan, Q.H. Wang, and F.S. Li. 2006. The
application of earthworm avoidance test in ecological risk
assessment of naphthalene-contaminated soils. Journal of
Agro-Environmental Science 26:538-543.
Hightower, J., and D. Moore. 2002. Mercury levels in high-
end consumers of fi sh. Environmental Health Perspectives
111:604 - 608.
Holloman, E.L., and M.C. Newman. 2006. A probabilistic
assessment of mercury exposure to African Americans
consuming local fi sh and shellfi sh. Transactions of the
American Geophysical Union 87:suppl 36.
Hughner, R.S., J.K. Maher, and N.M. Childs. 2008. Review of
food policy and consumer issues of mercury in fi sh. Journal
of the American College of Nutrition 27:185-194.
Hung, C.L.H., R.K.F. Lau, J.C.W. Lam, T.A. Jerrerson, S.K.
Hung, M.H.W. Lam, and P.K.S. Lam. 2007. Risk assessment
of trace elements in the stomach contents of Indo-Pacifi c
humpback dolphins and fi nless porpoises in Hong Kong
waters. Chemosphere 66:1175-1182.
Hunsaker, C.T., R.L. Graham, G.W. Suter II, R.V. O'Neill, L.W.
Barnthouse, and R.H. Gardner. 1990. Assessing ecological
risk on a regional scale. Journal of Environmental Management
14:325 -332.
Hylander, L.D., E.C. Silva, L.J. Oliveira, S.A. Silva, E.K. Kuntze,
and D.X. Silva. 1994. Mercury levels in Alto Pantanal: a
screening study. Ambio 33:478-484.
Iannuzzi, T.J., T.N. Armstrong, J.B. Thelen, D.F. Ludwig, and
C.D. Firstenberg. 2004. Chemical contamination of aquatic
organisms from an urbanized river in the New York/New
Jersey harbor estuary. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment
10:389-413.
IOM (Institute of Medicine). 1991. Seafood Safety. National
Academy Press, Wasington, DC.
IOM, 2006. Seafood choices: balancing benefi ts and risks.
Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Iwata, T., M. Sakamoto, X. Feng, M. Yoshida, X.J. Liu, M.
Dakeishi, P. Li, G. Qiu, H. Jiang, M. Nakamura, and M.
Kaysuyuki. 2007. Effects of mercury vapor exposure on
neuromotor function in Chinese miners and smelters.
International Archives of Occupational and Environmental
Health 80: 381-387.
Jewett, S., C.X. Zhang, A.S. Naidu, J.J. Kelley, D. Dasher,
and L.K. Duffy. 2003. Comparison of mercury and
methylmercury in northern pike and Arctic grayling from
western Alaska rivers. Chemosphere 50:381-392.
JECFA (Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives).
1999. Evaluation of certain food additives and contaminants.
Fifty-third report of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee
on Food Additives. WHO Technical Report Series 896.
Geneva: World Health Organization, pp 87-93.
JECFA (Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food
Additives). 2003. Summary and conclusions of the sixty-
fi rst meeting of the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on
Food Additives (JECFA), pp. 18-22. http://www.who.int/pcs/
jecfa/Summary61.pdf (accessed 18 Jan 2011).
JECFA. 2004. Methylmercury. In: Safety evaluation of certain
food additives and contaminants. Report of the 61st Joint
FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives. Geneva:
World Health Organization, International Programme on
Chemical Safety. WHO Technical Report Series 922, pp
132-139. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/trs/WHO_TRS_922.pdf
(accessed 1 Jan 2011).
JECFA. 2006. Methylmercury. Summary and conclusions
of the 67th Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on
Food Additives. Geneva, World Health Organization,
International Programme on Chemical Safety. WHO
Technical Report Series 940. www.who.int/ipcs/food/jecfa/
summaries/summary67.pdf (accessed February 23, 2012).
Johnston, J.J., and J.L. Snow. 2007. Population-based fi sh
consumption survey and probabilistic methylmercury risk
assessment. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment 13:
1214-1227.
Lackey, R.T. 1996. Is ecological risk assessment useful for
resolving complex ecological problems? In: Pacifi c Salmon
and their ecosystems: status and future options. Stouder, D.J.
Bisson, P.A. and Naiman, R.J. (eds.). New York: Chapman &
Hall, pp. 525-540.
Search WWH ::




Custom Search