Geoscience Reference
In-Depth Information
Given the successes documented from previous ESA efforts, future ESA
Presidents will likely choose to sharpen the Society's focus on Earth Stewardship in
different ways. Recent discussions with other professional societies whose expertise
is related to stewardship have documented broad common interests that can be
developed in the future. A recent effort by the ESA and the British Ecological
Society to foster regular discussions among leaders of all the world's ecological
societies will provide an opportunity to interest a global audience of ecologists.
The changes that we ecologists have seen in less than a generation include
remarkable advances in technology (e.g., computing power, global positioning sys-
tems, geographic information systems, sensor networks), rapid changes in global
climate, a blossoming of quantitative analytical techniques, an explosion of infor-
mation with the digital revolution, and a great increase in cross-disciplinary and
international collaborations. The kinds of science that can be done have changed,
and the training of new generations of ecologists must change accordingly. Amidst
all these changes to our fi eld, the natural world is also changing at an unprecedented
rate. This set of circumstances puts ESA at a critical juncture where we have the
opportunity to train future generations of ecologists to work effectively in a world
that is fundamentally different from the one in which we grew up. Further, ESA
must intensify efforts to partner with a wider range of institutions and become more
active participants in problem-solving, recognizing that compromise is often neces-
sary. Having realized these challenges and begun to respond, ESA must continue to
embrace them.
Acknowledgments We thank the staff, governing board, and members of the Ecological Society
of America, especially Executive Director Katherine McCarter, for their engagement in crafting
and implementing ESA's Earth Stewardship Initiative. We also thank Baird Callicott, Cliff Duke,
Katherine McCarter, and Teresa Mourad for their careful review of this chapter.
References
AGU (2013) Helping audiences receive climate-science information: a message framework for
scientists. Unpublished report
Bonilla NO, Scholl J, Armstrong M et al (2012) Ecological science and public policy: an intersec-
tion of action ecology. Bull Ecol Soc Am 93:340-345
Callicott JB (2015) The centennial return of stewardship to the Ecological Society of America. In:
Rozzi R, Chapin FS III, Callicott JB et al (eds) Earth stewardship: linking ecology and ethics
in theory and practice. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 161-171
Chapin FS III, Fernandez E (2013) Proactive ecology for the Anthropocene. Elementa.
doi: 10.12952/journal.elementa.000013
Chapin FS III, Power ME, Pickett STA et al (2011) Earth stewardship: science for action to sustain
the human-earth system. Ecosphere 2(8):art89 doi: 10.1890/ES11-00166.1
Chapin FS III, Kofi nas GP, Folke C (eds) (2009) Principles of ecosystem stewardship: resilience-
based natural resource management in a changing World. Springer, New York
Christensen NL, Bartuska AM, Brown JH et al (1996) The report of the Ecological Society of
America committee on the scientifi c basis for ecosystem management. Ecol Appl 6:665-691
Clark WC, Dickson NM (2003) Sustainability science: the emerging research program. Proc Natl
Acad Sci U S A 100(14):8059-8061
Search WWH ::




Custom Search