The Mind - Brutes or Angels: Human Possibility in the Age of Biotechnology - page 250

Domasio, A. 1999. The Feeling of What Happens. new york: harcourt.
Gilbert, s. f., A. l. Tyler, and e. J. Zackin. 2005. “What is normal?” in Bioeth-
ics and the New Embryology: Springboards for Debate, 215-26. sunderland, mA:
sinauer Associates.
Glannon, W. 2007. Bioethics and the Brain. new york: oxford University Press.
huxley, A. 1932. Brave New World. new york: harperCollins.
Kandel, e. r., J. h. schwartz, and T. m. Jessell. 2000. Principles of Neural Science.
4th ed. new york: mcGraw-hill Companies.
leDoux, J. 2002. Synaptic Self: How Our Brains Become Who We Are. new york: Pen-
guin Putnam. An accessible topic for nonscientists about the human brain and
the cellular processes responsible for its function.
lehrer, J. 2009. “neuroscience: small, furry . . . and smart.” Nature 461: 862-
64. This excellent article tells how research with mice gives clues as to how
neuroscientists may be able to give human cognition a big boost, but not
without drawbacks.
levy, n. 2007. Neuroethics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. An ex-
cellent overview of current issues in neuroethics.
moss, h. 2003. “implicit selves: A review of the Conference.” special issue: “The
self: from soul to Brain,” edited by J. leDoux, J. Debiec, and h. moss. An-
nals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1001: 1-30.
o'shea, m. 2005. The Brain: A Very Short Introduction. new york: oxford Univer-
sity Press. A great resource for the nonscientist.
starr, C., and B. mcmillan. 2010. “nervous system.” in Human Biology, 239 - 64.
Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Whitehouse, P. J., and e. Juengst. 1997. “enhancing Cognition in the intellectu-
ally intact.” Hastings Center Report 27 (3): 14-22.
Wolpe, P. r. 2003. “neuroethics.” in Encyclopedia of Bioethics, 3rd ed., edited by
s. G. Post, 1894-98. new york: Thomson Gale.