Chemistry Reference
In-Depth Information
Figure4.17. Cross-section of an X-ray beam reflected by a flat sample under an angle α .
Incident and reflected beam interfere in a triangle with height h . It can simply be shown that h
is w beam /(2 cos α ). For small angles, h is approximately w beam /2 (relative deviation < 0.06% for
angles < 2 ° ).
A first limitation is given by the geometry of excitation as illustrated in
Figure 4.17. The width of the primary beam w beam is usually limited by a slit that
is less than 30 μ m for X-ray tubes and less than 100 μ m for synchrotron beam
lines. The height of the triangular region h triangle where the standing wave field
appears is approximately w beam /2 for grazing incidence. For that reason, the
thickness of a specimen should be restricted to several tens of micrometers.
The second reason for a restriction arises from the limited counting capa-
bility of the detector. A count rate of about 12 000 cps for a Si(Li) detector and
of 1 000 000 cps for an SDD is a maximum value where the dead time
percentage is 63%. This high count rate is achieved for a specimen amount
mainly depending on the matrix. Upper values have been determined exper-
imentally for three typical matrices characterized by their density ρ : organic
tissues (dried, 0.2 g/cm 3 ), mineral powders ( 1-2 g/cm 3 ), and covers of metal
salts ( 2.5 g/cm 3 ) or metallic smears ( 8 g/cm 3 ). The upper limits, m max , are
250 μ g/cm 2 for organic tissues, 140 μ g/cm 2 for mineral powders or salts, and 8 μ g/
cm 2 for metallic smears. This is a rough estimate from unpublished measure-
ments and can differ by a factor of two for the different excitation modes
mentioned in Section 4.2.1.
The corresponding thickness d max
can be determined according to
d max
m max = ρ
(4.14)
provided that the carrier is uniformly covered. This quantity d max is 12 μ m for
organic tissues, 0.7 μ m for mineral powders, and 10 nm for metallic smears.
4.4.3.1MassandThicknessofThinLayers
As already mentioned, a further limitation can be caused by a strong selective
X-ray absorption of the matrix for the analyte element. For a thin layer the
absorption can be expressed by Equation 4.1. It causes an intensity deficit,
which will remain below a certain permissible level a rel in percent, if the
thickness of the specimen is restricted to a maximum value d max . This further
 
Search WWH ::




Custom Search