Environmental Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
(a)
(b)
(c)
Kotuy region
Arydzhangsky Formation
Conglomerate test
N Up
N Up
Mean ID and DG directions
W
E
N
N
592°
591°
DG,ID
W
E
Samples
R/R = 2.33/6.98
0
Medvejia
270
90
NRM
100
0
NRM
S Down
S Down
Sample 19-2
Sample 468
(f)
(e)
(d)
Onkuchaksky Formation
Magnetic polarity
N Up
N
U
p
Mean ID and DG directions
W
E
100°
N
545°
DG,ID
Truba
OOn
270
90
90
200°
100°
560°
W
E
S Down
350°
S Down
Ar
Sample 229
Sample 1
(i)
(g)
(h)
Norilsk region
Ergalakh section
Magnetic polarity
Mean ID and DG directions
N
U
p
N
N Up
240°
i)
590°
W
E
Gd
120°
DG,ID
Ergalakh
Sv
270
90
Iv
W
E
100°
590°
S Down
S Down
180
Sample 1-8
Sample 10-4
(j)
(k)
(l)
Sunduk section
Magnetic polarity
Mean ID and DG directions
N Up
N Up
240°
N
W
E
590°
Nd
120°
DG,ID
Sunduk
590°
270
90
W
E
Tk
180°
Kh
Gd
100°
S Down
S Down
Sv
Sample S1-8
Sample 29-3
180
Iv
Figure 5.3 Paleomagnetism of trap formations of the Kotuy River valley and the
Norilsk region. (a), (d) Orthogonal component plots for the samples from the
Arydzhangsky (a) and Onkuchaksky (d) formations. (g), (j) Orthogonal component
