Biology Reference
In-Depth Information
Table 14.4 A comparison between the
macro-to-micro transitions
in
physics
and
biology
that
have occurred or are currently in progress in theory building. These transitions can be analyzed in
terms of another dichotomy, namely,
energy
versus
information
as shown below
Energy
Information
P
h
y
s
i
c
s
Macro
Continuous
Confined to the mental world
Micro
Discrete (quantization of energy, quantum,
quons)
Extended to physical processes
(Wolfram 2002; Lloyd 2009;
Ji 1999a)
(1) Energy is quantized (Sect.
11.3.3
)
B
i
o
l
o
g
y
Macro
Orthogonal to information
Orthogonal to energy
Inseparable from energy (i.e., fused
with
energy
to form
gnergy
)
(Sect.
2.3.2
)
1. Information-energy complementarity (or gnergy as the complementary union
2. Gnergons (i.e., discrete units of gnergy) as the driving force for all self-
organizations (Sect.
2.3.2
)
3. Conformons (gnergons embedded in biopolymers) as the driving force for all
goal-directed molecular motions in the cell (Chap.
8
)
5. The cell is the smallest physical unit that can evolve in the Darwinian sense
(Sect.
14.2
)
there was a conceptual revolution of a sort that was centered on
entropy
about a
quarter of a century earlier than the quantum revolution (see Row b in Table
14.3
):
L. Boltzmann (1872-1875) introduced the concept of
statistical weights
(Volkenstein 2009, p. 64) (or its cognates “information,” “order,” “disorder,”
etc.) into physics. Prior to Boltzmann, R. Clausius (1822-1888) defined the change
in the thermodynamic entropy, S, of a system as the ratio of two macroscopic
observables, the heat absorbed by the system reversibly, dQ, and the temperature,
T, at which this heat transfer takes place; that is, dS
dQ/T. Boltzmann connected
the macroscopic entity S (or dS for small change in S) with microscopic entity W,
the number of the molecular configurations or states compatible with (or accessible
to) the macroscopic state of the system, that is, S
¼
¼
k ln W, where k is the
Boltzmann constant.
A
molecular revolution
also occurred in the field of chemistry in the first decades
of the twentieth century in the form of the connection established between
Mendeleev's periodic table of macroscopic properties of chemical elements and
the atomic structures of the elements predicted by quantum mechanics (see Row c
in Table
14.3
).
Following what may be called the “molecularizing trend,” the “molecular turn,”
or the “from-macroscopic-to-microscopic trend” in natural sciences as evident in
Rows a through c in Table
14.3
, I perceive a similar
molecular revolution
in biology
(see also Table
14.4
). In other words, I believe that there are many
macroscopic