Biomedical Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
9. Mitchell JP, Nagel MW (2003) Cascade impactors for the size characterization of aerosols
from medical inhalers: their use and limitations. J Aerosol Med 16:341-377
10. Dunbar C, Mitchell JP (2005) Analysis of cascade impactor mass distributions. J Aerosol Med
18(4):439-451
11. World Bank Group (1999) Pollution prevention and abatement handbook. The World Bank
Group, Washington, DC
12. Health Canada (2006) Guidance for industry on the pharmaceutical quality of inhaled and
nasal products. File Number: 06-106624-547, Ottawa, ON. Available at:
http://www.hc-sc.
13. Mohammed H, Roberts D, Copley M, Hammond M, Mitchell J (2012) Effect of sampling
volume on dry powder inhaler (DPI)-emitted aerosol aerodynamic particle size distributions
(APSDs) measured by the Next Generation pharmaceutical Impactor (NGI) and the Andersen
eight-stage cascade impactor (ACI). AAPS PharmSciTech 13(3):875-882
14. Roberts DL (2009) Theory of multi-nozzle impactor stages and the interpretation of stage
mensuration data. Aerosol Sci Technol 43(11):1119-1129
15. Chambers F, Ali A, Mitchell J, Shelton C, Nichols S (2010) Cascade impactor (CI) mensura-
tion—An assessment of the accuracy and precision of commercially available optical measure-
ment systems. AAPS PharmSciTech 11(1):472-484
16. Marple VA, Liu BYH (1974) Characteristics of laminar jet impactors. Environ Sci Technol
8:648-654
17. Vinchurkar S, Longest PW, Peart JP (2009) CFD simulations of the Andersen cascade impac-
tor: model development and effects of aerosol charge. J Aerosol Sci 40:807-822
18. Mitchell JP, Costa PA, Waters S (1986) An assessment of an Andersen Mark-II cascade impac-
tor. J Aerosol Sci 19(2):213-221
19. Vaughan NP (1989) The Andersen cascade impactor: calibration, wall losses, and numerical
simulation. J Aerosol Sci 20(1):213-221
20. Asking L, Olsson B (1997) Calibration at different flow rates of a multistage liquid impinger.
Aerosol Sci Technol 27(1):39-49
21. Marple VA, Olson BA, Santhanakrishnan K, Roberts DL, Mitchell JP, Hudson-Curtis BL
(2003) Next generation pharmaceutical impactor. Part II: archival calibration. J Aerosol Med
16(3):301-324
22. Marple VA, Olson BA, Santhanakrishnan K, Roberts DL, Mitchell JP, Hudson-Curtis BL
(2004) Next generation pharmaceutical impactor. Part III: extension of archival calibration to
15 L/min. J Aerosol Med 17(4):335-343
23. Stein SW, Olson BA (1997) Variability in size distribution measurements obtained using mul-
tiple Andersen Mark II cascade impactors. Pharm Res 14(12):1718-1725
24. Rader DJ, Marple VA (1985) Effect of ultra-Stokesian drag and particle interception on impac-
tor characteristics. Aerosol Sci Technol 4(2):141-156
25. Marple VA (2002) Private communication. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
26. Marple VA, Olson BA, Miller NC (1998) The role of inertial particle collectors in evaluating
pharmaceutical aerosol systems. J Aerosol Med 11S1:S139-S153
27. Nichols SC (2000) Calibration and mensuration issues for the standard and modified Andersen
cascade impactor. Pharm Forum 26(5):1466-1469
28. Fang CP, Marple VA, Rubow KL (1991) Influence of cross-flow on particle collection charac-
teristics of multi-nozzle impactors. J Aerosol Sci 22:403-415
29. Nichols SC, Smurthwaite M (1998) The Andersen cascade impactor: calibration data, opera-
tion at various airflow rates and modified for use with DPIs at various airflow rates. In: Byron
PR, Dalby RN, Farr SJ (eds) Respiratory drug delivery-VI. Interpharm Press, Buffalo Grove,
IL, pp 393-396
30. Nichols SC, Brown DR, Smurthwaite M (1998) New concept for the variable flow rate
Andersen cascade impactor and calibration data. J Aerosol Med 11S1:S133-S138
31. Byron PR, Cummings RH, Nichols SC, Poochikian G, Smurthwaite MJ, Stein SW, Truman
KG (2004) Selection validation of cascade impactor methods. In: Dalby RN, Byron PR, Peart J,
Search WWH ::
Custom Search