Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
15.
Sony Computer Entertainment, Inc. v. Connectix Corp., 203 F.3d 596, 609 (9th Cir. 2000),
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=7166769136737271
634&q=Sony+Computer+Entertainment,+Inc.+v.+Connectix+Corp.,+
203+F.3d+59&hl=en&as_sdt=6,50
16.
Sega Enterprises Ltd. v. Accolade, Inc., 977 F.2d 1510, 1514 (9th Cir. 1992),
http://
scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=12221231553971530035&q=
Sega+Enterprises+Ltd.+v.+Accolade,+Inc.,+977+F.2d+1510&hl=en
&as_sdt=6,50
17.
Atari Games Corp. v. Nintendo of America, Inc. Sega Enterprises Ltd. v. Accolade, Inc.,
977 F.2d 1510., 975 F.2d 832 (Fed. Cir 1992),
http://scholar.google.com/
scholar_case?case=12221231553971530035&q=+1514+%289th+Cir.+1
992%29.+17.+Atari+Games+Corp.+v.+Ninten&hl=en&as_sdt=6,50
18.
Exemption to Prohibition on Circumvention of Copyright Protection Systems for Access
Control Technologies, 75 Federal Register 43825, 43829 (2010),
http://www.google
.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0CCYQFjAA&
url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.copyright.gov%2Ffedreg%2F2010%2F75fr438
25.pdf&ei=de7rUsioFMTB2wWwiYCgBg&usg=AFQjCNF0f7irwyYafuJ6FjT
kFNR-ovSRsw&bvm=bv.60444564,d.b2I.
19.
Kirtsaeng v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2013 WL 1104736,
http://scholar.google
.com/scholar_case?case=15712401143530412161&q=Kirtsaeng+v.+J
ohn+Wiley+%26+Sons,+Inc.,+2013+WL+1104736.&hl=en&as_sdt=6,50
20.
Capital Records, LLC v. ReDIGI Inc., 934 F. Supp. 2d 640, 655 (S.D.N.Y. 2013)
(emphasis added),
http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=1198
7243262728384575&q=Capitol+Records+v.+ReDIGI+&hl=en&as_sdt
=6,50
21.
Comb v. PayPal, Inc., 218 F. Supp. 2d 1165, 1172 (N.D. Cal. 2002),
http://scholar
.google.com/scholar_case?case=15174879769896251427&q=Comb+v.
+PayPal,+Inc.,+218+F.+Supp.+2d+1165&hl=en&as_sdt=6,50
,
citing Blake v. Ecker, 113 Cal. Rptr. 2d 422 (2001)
22.
Garner, B.: Black's Law Dictionary, 9th edn. Thomson West (2009)
23.
AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 131 S.Ct. 1740 (2011),
http://scholar
.google.com/scholar_case?case=17088816341526709934&q=AT%26T+
Mobility+LLC+v.+Concepcion,+131+S.Ct.+1740+%282011%29.+&hl=e
n&as_sdt=6,50
24.
Restatement (Second) of Contracts ยง 208 (Unconscionable Contract or Term), comment e,
Unconscionable terms. American Law Institute (1981)
Search WWH ::
Custom Search