Civil Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
of r and s . Therefore, the integrals can be evaluated exactly by using two Gauss points
in r and s . Per Table 6.1, the required Gauss points and weighting factors are r i , s j
=
± 0 . 57735 and W i , W j
= 1 . 0 , i , j
= 1, 2 . Using the numerical procedure for k 11 , we write
1
1
1
1
= k x t b
a
1
16 ( s
d r d s + k y t b
a
1
16 ( r
1) 2
1) 2
k 11
d r d s
1
1
1
1
1
1
16 ( r
1) 2 ( s
1) 2
+
2 hab
d r d s
1
2
2
2
2
= k x t b
a
1
16 W i W j ( s j
+ k y t a
b
1
16 W i W j ( r i
1) 2
1) 2
i =
j =
i =
j =
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
16 W i W j (1
r i ) 2 (1
s j ) 2
+
2 hab
i =
j =
1
1
and, using the specified integration points and weighting factors, this evaluates to
1
3
1
3
2 hab 4
9
= k x t b
a
+ k y t a
b
k 11
+
It is extremely important to note that the result expressed in the preceding equation is the
correct value of k 11 for any rectangular element used for the two-dimensional heat con-
duction analysis discussed in this section. The integrations need not be repeated for each
element; only the geometric quantities and the conductance values need be substituted to
obtain the value. Indeed, if we substitute the values for this example, we obtain
= 0 . 6327 Btu/(hr- F )
k 11
as per the analytical integration procedure.
Proceeding with the Gaussian integration procedure (calculation of some of these
terms are to be evaluated as end-of-chapter problems), we find
= 0 . 6327 Btu/(hr- F )
k 11
= k 22
= k 33
= k 44
Why are these values equal?
The off-diagonal terms (again using the numerical integration procedure) are calcu-
lated as
k 12
=−
0
.
1003
k 13
=−
0
.
2585
k 14
=−
0
.
1003
k 23
=−
0
.
1003
k 24
=−
0
.
2585
k 34
=− 0 . 1003
Search WWH ::




Custom Search