Enhancing University Students’ Interaction and Learning through Formative Peer-Assessment Online - Collaborative Technologies and Applications for Interactive Information Design - page 67

Macdonald, J. (2002). Exploiting Online Interac-
tivity to Enhance Assignment Development and
Feedback in Distance Education, Open Learning.
The Journal of Open and Distance Learning ,
16 (2), 179-189.

Sadler,R.D.(2005).Interpretationsofcriteria-based
assessment and grading in higher education . As-
sessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , 30 (2),
175-194. doi:10.1080/0260293042000264262

Sadler, R. D. (2008). Indeterminacy in the use of
preset criteria for assessment and grading. Assess-
ment & Evaluation in Higher Education, iFirst
Article , April 2008, 1-20.

Macpherson, K. (1999). The Development
of Critical Thinking Skills in Undergraduate
Supervisory Management Units: efficacy of
student peer assessment. Assessment & Evalu-
ation in Higher Education , 24 (3), 273-284.
doi:10.1080/0260293990240302

Sainsbury, E. J., & Walker, R. A. (2008). As-
sessment as a vehicle for learning: extending
collaboration into testing. Assessment & Evalu-
ation in Higher Education , 33 (2), 103-117.
doi:10.1080/02602930601127844

Miller, C. M. L., & Parlett, M. (1974). Up to the
mark: a study of the examination game. London:
SRHE.

Snyder, B. R. (1971). The hidden curriculum.
New York: Knopf. O'Donovan, B., Price, M., & Rust, C. (2004).

Know what I mean? Enhancing student under-
standing of assessment standards and criteria.
Teaching in Higher Education , 9 (3), 325-335.
doi:10.1080/1356251042000216642

Stefani, L. (1998). Assessment in Partner-
ship with Learners. Assessment & Evalua-
tion in Higher Education , 23 (4), 339-350.
doi:10.1080/0260293980230402

Olson, D. R. (1994), The world on paper. Cam-
bridge, UK: Cambridge University press.

Swedish Agency for Networks and cooperation
in Higher Education, homepage. The Swedish
Higher Education act (n.d.). Retrieved January
7, 2009 from http://www.sweden.gov.se/sb/
d/3288/a/19574

Ong, W. J. (1982) Orality and literacy: The Tech-
nologizing of the Word . New York: Methuen.

Orsmond, P., Merry, S., & Reiling, K.
(1996). The importance of marking criteria
in peer assessment . Assessment & Evalua-
tion in Higher Education , 21 (3), 239-249.
doi:10.1080/0260293960210304

Swedish Higher Education Ordinance (n.d.). Re-
trieved January 7, 2009 from http://www.sweden.
gov.se/sb/d/3288/a/19574

Topping, K. (1998). Peer-assessment between
students in colleges and universities. Review of
Educational Research , (68): 249-276.

Orsmond, P., Merry, S., & Reiling, K. (1997). A
study in self-assessment; tutor and students' per-
ceptions of performance criteria. Assessment &
Evaluation in Higher Education , 22 (4), 357-369.
doi:10.1080/0260293970220401

Torrance, H. (2007).Assessment as learning? How
the use of explicit learning objectives, assessment
criteria and feedback in post-secondary educa-
tion and training can come to dominate learning.
Assessment in Education: Principles . Policy &
Practice , 14 (3), 281-294.

Prins, F. J., Sluijsmans, D., Kirschner, P.A., & Stri-
jbos, J.-W. (2005). Formative peer assessment in
a CSCL environment: a case study. Assessment &
Evaluation in Higher Education , 30 (4), 417-444.
doi:10.1080/02602930500099219