Environmental Engineering Reference
In-Depth Information
81. Girardet, H. (2004). Urban Planning and Sustainable Energy: Theory and Practice ,
Forum Barcelona, Retrieved May 12, 2009, from http://www.barcelona2004.
org/www.barcelona2004.org/eng/banco_del_conocimiento/dialogos/
fichac390.html
82. Gerardet, H. (2008). Cities People Planet: Urban Development and Climate Change ,
2nd ed., John Wiley, West Sussex, England.
83. Rees, W. (1992). Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity,
Environment & Urbanization , Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 121-130.
84. Newman, P. (2006). The environmental impact of cities, Environment and
Urbanization , Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 275-295.
85. Rees, W. (2000). Eco-footprint analysis: Merits and brickbats, Ecological
Economics , Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 371-374.
86. Chambers, N., Simmons, C., and Wackernagel, M. (2000). Sharing Nature's
Interest: Ecological Footprints as an Indicator of Sustainability , Earthscan, London.
87. Andrey, J., Johnson, L. C., Moos, M., and Whitfield, J. (2006). Does design mat-
ter? The ecological footprint as a planning tool at the local level, Journal of Urban
Design , Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 195-224.
88. Ewing, B., Moore, D., Goldfinger, S., Oursler, A., Reed, A. and Wackernagel, M.
(2010). The Ecological Footprint Atlas 2010 , Global Footprint Network, Oakland, CA.
89. Gordon, P. and Richardson, H. (1998). Farmland preservation and ecological
footprints: A critique, Planning and Markets , Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 1-7.
90. Holmberg, J., Lundqvist, U., Robert, K. H., and Wackernagel, M. (1999). The
ecological footprint from a systems perspective of sustainability, International
Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology , Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 17-33.
91. Van den Bergh, J. and Verbruggen, H. (1999). Spatial sustainability, trade and
indicators: An evaluation of the ecological footprint, Ecological Economics ,
Vol. 29, pp. 61-72.
92. Deutsch, L., Jansson, A., Troell, M., Ronnback, P., Folke, C., and Kautsky, N.
(2000). The ecological footprint: Communicating human dependence on nature's
work, Ecological Economics , Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 351-356.
93. Herendeen, R. (2000). Ecological footprint is a vivid indicator of indirect effects,
Ecological Economics , Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 357-358.
94. Moffatt, I. (2000). Ecological footprints and sustainable development, Ecological
Economics , Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 359-362.
95. Rapport, D. J. (2000). Ecological footprints and ecosystem health: Comple-
mentary approaches to a sustainable future, Ecological Economics , Vol. 32, No. 3,
pp. 367-370.
96. Templet, P. (2000). Externalities, subsidies, and the ecological footprint: An
empirical analysis, Ecological Economics , Vol. 32, No. 3, pp. 381-384.
97. Brindle, R. E. (1994). Lies, damned lies and 'automobile dependence'—
Some hyperbolic reflections, Australian Transport Research Forum , Vol. 94,
pp. 117-131.
98. Evill, B. (1995). Population, urban density, and fuel use: Eliminating spurious
correlation, Urban Policy and Research , Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 29-36.
99. Leung, H. L. (2003). Land Use Planning Made Plain , 2nd ed., University of Toronto
Press, Toronto.
100. Draper, D. (1998). Our Environment, A Canadian Perspective , Thomson Nelson,
Toronto.
Search WWH ::




Custom Search