Biology Reference
In-Depth Information
reading the input file properly. For example, the line break
character(s) differ across popular operating systems. To convert
line breaks from a non-Mac format to a Mac format, try external
utilities like TextWrangler's “Translate Line Breaks” command
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a training fellowship to KL from the
Keck Center of the Gulf Coast Consortia, on the NLM Training
Program in Biomedical Informatics, National Library of Medicine
(NLM) T15LM007093. This work was also partially supported by
NSF grant DEB 0733029 to TW. This material was based on work
supported by the National Science Foundation, while TW was
working at the Foundation. Any opinion, finding, and conclusions
or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the
authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National
Science Foundation.
References
1. Kemena C, Notredame C (2009) Upcoming
challenges for multiple sequence alignment
methods in the high-throughput era. Bioinfor-
matics 25:2455-2465
2. Nelesen S, Liu K, Zhao D et al (2008) The
effect of the guide tree on multiple sequence
alignments and subsequent phylogenetic ana-
lyses. Pac Symp Biocomput 2008:25-36
3. Liu K, Linder CR, Warnow T (2010) Multiple
sequence alignment: a major challenge to
large-scale phylogenetics. PLoS Curr 2,
RRN1198
4. Wang L-S, Leebens-Mack J, Wall PK, Beckman
K, de Pamphilis CW, Warnow T (2011) The
impact of multiple protein sequence alignment
on phylogenetic estimation. IEEE Trans Com-
put Biol Bioinform 8:1108-1119
5. Cantarel BL, Morrison HG, Pearson W (2006)
Exploring the relationship between sequence
similarity and accurate phylogenetic trees. Mol
Biol Evol 11:2090-100
6. L¨ytynoja A, Goldman N (2008) Phylogeny-
aware gap placement prevents errors in
sequence alignment and evolutionary analysis.
Science 320(5883):1632-5
7. Hall BG (2005) Comparison of the accuracies
of several phylogenetic methods using protein
and DNA sequences. Mol Biol Evol 22(3):
792-802
8. Morrison DA, Ellis JT (1997) Effects of
nucleotide sequence alignment on phylogeny
estimation: a case study of 18S rDNAs of
Api-
complexa
. Mol Biol Evol 14(4):428-41
9. Ogden TH, Rosenberg MS (2006) Multiple
sequence alignment accuracy and phylogenetic
inference. Syst Biol 55(2):314-28
10. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP et al
(2007) ClustalWand ClustalX version 2.0. Bio-
informatics 23:2947-2948
11. Edgar RC (2004) MUSCLE: a multiple
sequence alignment method with reduced
time and space complexity. BMC Bioinformat-
ics 5:113
12. Edgar RC (2004) MUSCLE: a multiple
sequence alignment with high accuracy and
high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32:
1792-1797
13. Katoh K, Toh H (2008) Recent developments
in the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment
program. Brief Bioinformatics 9:286-298
14. Nelesen S, Liu K, Wang L-S et al (2012) DAC-
TAL: fast and accurate estimations of trees
without computing full sequence alignments.
Bioinformatics 28:i274-i282
15. Var´n A, Vinh LS, Wheeler WC (2010) POY
version 4: phylogenetic analysis using dynamic
homologies. Cladistics 26:72-85
16. Liu K, Nelesen S, Raghavan S, Linder CR,
Warnow T (2009) Barking up the wrong tree-
length: the impact of gap penalty on alignment
and tree accuracy. IEEE/ACM Trans Comput
Biol Bioinform 6(1):7-21
