Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
of cloud voting service is public events. Whether large or small, indoor or outdoor,
audience voting in public events has become a trend. For example, New Year
countdown shows, concerts, political gatherings, or government-held events usually
last for hours and are attended by large crowds of audiences. Occasional audience
interactions via cloud voting using their personal cell phones create an innovative
and entertaining atmosphere within these events.
9.5 Conclusions
In this article, an incremental innovation of PRS has been described as an achievable,
short-term technology integration for potentially profitable business opportunities.
Although cloud voting service is a specialized service, it demonstrates how
technologies can enable the transformation of a traditional product or service into a
new business model. Furthermore, its influence can be sufficiently significant in
changing the instructional design or classroom practices in different levels of the
educational system. The influence of PRS may be sufficiently wide to be popularly
used in many business routines that would have never considered before using such a
service.
References
Abrahamson L (2006) A brief history of networked classrooms: effects, cases, pedagogy, and
implications. In: Banks DA (ed) Audience response systems in higher education. Information
Science, Hershey, pp 1-25
ATG (2010) Personal response systems (clickers). Harvard University. http://atg.fas.harvard.edu/
icb/icb.do?keyword
icb.page318552 . Accessed 1 Mar 2012
Beuckman J, Rebello NS, Zollman D (2006) Impact of a classroom interaction system on student
learning. In: McCullough L, Hsu L, Heron P (eds) Physics education research conference.
American Institute of Physics, July 26-27, Syracuse, New York
Boardman DE (1968) The use of immediate response system in junior college. Unpublished
master's thesis, University of California. Los Angeles
Briggs LL (2006) Response devices keep FSU students focused, Campus Technology. http://
campustechnology.com/articles/2006/11/response-devices-keep-fsu-students-focused.aspx .
Accessed 1 Mar 2012
Bunce DM, VandenPlas JR, Havanki KL (2006) Comparing the effectiveness on student achieve-
ment of a student response system versus online WebCT quizzes. J Chem Educ 83(3):488
Bunz U (2005) Using scantron versus an audience response system for survey research: does
methodology matter when measuring computer-mediated communication competence?
Comput Hum Behav 21:343-359
Caldwell JE (2007) Clickers in the large classroom: current research and best-practice tips. Life
Sci Educ 6(1):9-20
Carlson S (2001) A professor uses cell phones in class to check students' comprehension. The
Chronicle of Higher Education, June 21. http://www.erskine.edu/bq/chronicle.html . Accessed
1 Mar 2012
atg&pageid
¼
¼
Search WWH ::




Custom Search