Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
Table 15 The results of the comparison of multi-objective optimization algorithms for the FON
test function
Metrics
NSGA-II
SPEA
PAES
The hybrid algorithm
3.78 × 10 1
7.92 × 10 1
1.16 × 10 0
5.90 × 10 1
Δ
Mean
10 4
10 3
10 3
10 2
Standard deviation 6.39
×
5.54
×
8.94
×
3.60
×
10 3
10 1
10 1
10 3
!
Mean
1.93
×
1.25
×
1.51
×
1.56
×
3.80 × 10 5
9.05 × 10 4
1.71 × 10 4
Standard deviation 0
Table 16 The results of the comparison of multi-objective optimization algorithms for the ZDT1
test function
Metrics
NSGA-II
SPEA
PAES
The hybrid algorithm
3.90 × 10 1
7.84 × 10 1
1.22 × 10 0
6.55 × 10 1
Δ
Mean
10 3
10 3
10 3
10 2
Standard deviation 1.87
×
4.44
×
4.83
×
4.91
×
10 2
10 3
10 2
10 3
!
Mean
3.34
×
1.79
×
8.20
×
8.16
×
10 3
10 6
10 3
10 3
Standard deviation 4.75
×
1.00
×
8.67
×
2.73
×
Table 17 The results of the comparison of multi-objective optimization algorithms for the ZDT2
test function
Metrics
NSGA-II
SPEA
PAES
The hybrid algorithm
10 1
10 1
10 0
10 1
Mean
4.30
×
7.55
×
1.16
×
9.57
×
Δ
10 3
10 3
10 3
10 2
Standard deviation 4.72
×
4.52
×
7.68
×
3.20
×
7.23 × 10 2
1.33 × 10 3
1.26 × 10 1
3.04 × 10 2
!
Mean
10 2
10 2
10 2
Standard deviation 3.16
×
0
3.68
×
1.84
×
Table 18 The results of the comparison of multi-objective optimization algorithms for the ZDT3
test function
Metrics
NSGA-II
SPEA
PAES
The hybrid algorithm
10 1
10 1
10 1
10 1
Mean
7.38
×
6.72
×
7.89
×
6.28
×
Δ
Standard deviation 1.97 × 10 2
3.58 × 10 3
1.65 × 10 3
5.30 × 10 2
10 1
10 2
10 2
10 3
!
Mean
1.14
×
4.75
×
2.38
×
8.88
×
10 3
10 5
10 5
10 3
Standard deviation 7.94
×
4.70
×
1.00
×
6.97
×
6 State Feedback Control for Linear Systems
The vector state equation can be utilized for a continuous time system, as follows:
x ðÞ ¼
_
Ax ðÞþ
Bu ðÞþ
B v v
ð t Þ
ð
15
Þ
n stands for the state vector,
where x t
ðÞ2 R
x t
_
ðÞ
denotes the time derivative of state
m is the input vector. The disturbance v t
vector and u t
ðÞ2 R
ðÞ
is assumed to be a
Search WWH ::




Custom Search