Information Technology Reference
In-Depth Information
Load Current (Phase A)
20
0
-20
Source Current (Phase A)
40
20
0
-20
-40
Filter Current (Phase A)
10
0
-10
DC Link Voltage & Ref. Voltage
700
680
660
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
0.5
0.55
0.6
0.65
Time (sec)
Fig. 19 Dynamic response of shunt APF with 4-rule approximated FLC using Gaussian MFs
Table 5 Dynamic response of shunt APF controlled by 49-rule FLC and approximated FLC using
Gaussian MFs
Load
% peak overshoot/under-shoot
Settling time (cycles)
49-rule
FLC
Approximated
4-rule FLC
49-rule
FLC
Approximated
4-rule FLC
Case-1
0.51
0.53
0.92
0.95
Case-2
2.29
2.33
1.86
1.90
Case-3
1.32
1.34
0.42
0.44
time, are comparable with that of a 49-rule FLC and hence con
rm the effectiveness
of proposed approximation methodology.
The comparison of THD pro
le of source current with proposed approximated
FLC and 49-rule FLC using Gaussian MFs is shown in Fig. 20 . The harmonic
compensation performance of proposed scheme is at par with 49-rule FLC and even
better at the instant of load change.
Search WWH ::




Custom Search